Diphtheria antitoxin 10,000units/10ml solution for injection ampoules
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
View EudraVigilance report
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Diphtheria antitoxin
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary.
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 13 · Randomised trials: 1 · 1909–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Shaun Truelove, Lindsay T. Keegan, William J. Moss, et al.
Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2019
- Diphtheria
- Disease Outbreaks
- Vaccination
Naresh Chand Sharma, Androulla Efstratiou, Igor Mokrousov, et al.
Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 2019
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
- Corynebacterium
- Diphtheria
Liang Z, Liu S, Guo W, et al.
2025
- Tetanus
- Tetanus Antitoxin
- Antibodies, Monoclonal
Tetanus remains an important global public health concern. Currently, the only recommended passive immunization therapy for tetanus prophylaxis is plasma-derived human tetanus immunoglobulin (HTIG), which faces a global supply shortage and can transmit infectious pathogens. Despite not being endorsed by WHO due to safety concerns, equine tetanus antitoxin remains widely used in some countries. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial to evaluate siltartoxatug-a first-in-class recombinant monoclonal antibody-for tetanus postexposure prophylaxis. Participants (n = 675) were randomized (2:1) to receive a single intramuscular injection of siltartoxatug 10 mg or HTIG 250 IU. The study met its primary outcome, with siltartoxatug demonstrating superiority to HTIG in the proportion of participants with an increase of anti-tetanus neutralizing antibody titers from baseline (ΔTiter) ≥ 0.01 IU ml-1 (95.4% versus 53.2%; intergroup difference 42.3% (95% confidence interval, 35.5-49.1; P < 0.0001)). The safety profiles were comparable, with similar incidence of adverse events between the siltartoxatug (38.2%, 168 of 440) and HTIG (33.9%, 75 of 221) groups. These findings highlight siltartoxatug as an effective and safe option for passive immunization against tetanus. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05664750 .
Abstract licence: CC BY
Rockford K. Draper, M I Simon
The Journal of Cell Biology, 1980
- Ammonium Chloride
- Cell Line
- Cell Membrane
Kikuko Miyamura, Shigeko Nishio, Akiharu Ito, et al.
Journal of Biological Standardization, 1974
- Cell Line
- Haplorhini
- Cattle
Stanley A. Gall, John Myers, Michael E. Pichichero
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2011
- Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine
- Antibodies
- Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins
Nasir Abdulrasheed, Lukman Lawal, A. B. Mogaji, et al.
Immunity, Inflammation and Disease, 2023
- Diphtheria
- Corynebacterium
- Diphtheria Antitoxin
Theobald Smith
The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1909
Marta Prygiel, E. Mosiej, M. Polak, et al.
Toxins, 2024
- Diphtheria
- Diphtheria Toxin
- Corynebacterium
Poudel B, Lamsal A, Poudel CM
2023
Diphtheria cases are still being reported in various parts of the globe. Although complete heart block resulting from diphtheric myocarditis is infrequent, it can lead to fatality. Awareness and recognition of this help strengthen the importance of vaccines and their proper management.Case presentationThe authors report two young patients who presented in the interval of a month, to the emergency department with signs and symptoms of diphtheria. Both developed diphtheric myocarditis with complete heart block and severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction, which did not respond to temporary pacing.DiscussionDiphtheria remains rare but few cases continue to emerge, especially in developing countries. Those who develop it have high mortality, particularly from cardiomyopathy, airway compromise, and organ failure. Conduction abnormalities are diagnostic of diphtheric myocarditis and have a grim prognosis and treatment options are limited.ConclusionDiphtheric myocarditis has a poor prognosis and is an independent predictor of mortality. Since aggressive invasive treatment has not been shown to improve survival, early recognition along with antitoxin at the earliest suspicion and proper supportive care are the current best available options.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.