Dimenhydrinate 50mg tablets

BackgroundThe widespread availability and accessibility of over-the-counter (OTC) medicines play a vital role in modern healthcare systems, enabling individuals to manage minor health concerns independently. However, certain OTC medications possess pharmacological properties that render them susceptible to misuse and abuse, including stimulants, laxatives, sedatives, and opiate-containing products. Misuse involves improper dosage, duration, or indication, while abuse entails non-therapeutic use to achieve psychoactive effects or other illicit purposes, potentially leading to dependence and addiction. This review explores the risk of developing psychotic symptoms associated with OTC drug misuse. Synthesizing existing literature, it comprehensively examines the relationship between antihistamines, cough medicines, and decongestants misuse, and the onset of psychotic symptoms.MethodsA systematic literature review was carried out using Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science databases through the following search strategy: ("diphenhydramine" OR "promethazine" OR "chlorpheniramine" OR "dimenhydrinate" OR "dextromethorphan" OR "pseudoephedrine" OR codeine- based cough medicines) AND ("abuse" OR "misuse" OR "craving" OR "addiction") NOT review NOT (animal OR rat OR mouse). For data gathering purposes, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was followed. Research methods were registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024527558).ResultsWe analysed 46 relevant studies out of an initial pool of 2,677 articles. Key findings indicate that antihistamines, dextromethorphan, and other OTC drugs can induce psychotic symptoms, such as paranoia, hallucinations, and thought disorders when abused. Dextromethorphan is particularly associated with a chronic tendency towards psychosis, whereas other substances more commonly result in acute substance-induced psychosis.ConclusionThe study underscores the necessity for increased awareness and specific interventions to address the misuse of OTC drugs and their potential to cause significant psychiatric disorders, emphasizing the broader public health implications of such misuse.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Vertigo is a frequent reason for medical consultation and may result from a wide range of aetiologies. Betahistine and the fixed low-dose combination of cinnarizine 20 mg and dimenhydrinate 40 mg are commonly used therapeutic options, each with distinct antivertigo profiles. This systematic review, conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, aims to compare the efficacy and safety of these two treatments in patients with vertigo of various origins. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov, with no restrictions on language or publication date. Eligible studies included clinical trials and meta-analyses comparing the fixed low-dose combination (20 mg/40 mg) versus betahistine (12 or 16 mg), assessing efficacy through the Mean Vertigo Score (MVS) and safety based on the incidence of adverse events (AEs). The RoB 2 and ROBIS tools were used to evaluate the risk of bias. A total of nine studies were identified (six clinical trials and three meta-analyses). In five of the six clinical trials, the fixed low-dose combination significantly reduced MVS compared with betahistine at weeks 1 and/or 4 (p < .05); these findings were corroborated by the three meta-analyses. Regarding safety, both treatments were well tolerated, with no serious AEs reported and a generally lower incidence observed in the fixed low-dose combination group. Overall, the fixed low-dose combination demonstrated superior clinical efficacy from the first week of treatment, along with a more favourable tolerability and safety profile. These results support its preferential use in the management of acute vestibular syndrome.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Background: Nausea and vomiting in pregnancy affects up to 80% of pregnant women and may progress to hyperemesis gravidarum, leading to maternal morbidity and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Despite numerous pharmacological and non-pharmacological options, the comparative efficacy and safety of these interventions remain unclear. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials assessing pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. The databases searched included CENTRAL, PubMed, and EMBASE (up to 28 May 2024). Eligible trials compared interventions with a placebo in pregnant women with nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. The primary outcomes were symptom severity, assessed using validated tools. Safety outcomes included adverse effects. Data were pooled using frequentist pairwise and network meta-analyses. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB2 tool, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the CINeMA framework. Results: Of 9844 records screened, 24 randomized controlled trials (3017 participants) met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 16 intervention categories. Network analysis ranked quince, vitamin B6 with pomegranate and mint, acupressure P6, dimenhydrinate, and acupuncture combined with doxylamine-pyridoxine as the most effective interventions for reducing symptoms of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy, with considerable uncertainty and low-to-moderate quality of evidence. Reporting of adverse events was limited. Risk of bias was low to moderate. Discussion: Most interventions demonstrated significant benefit over a placebo. However, high heterogeneity and sparse reporting of adverse effects warrant caution when translating these results into clinical practice. Conclusions: This study indicates that both pharmacological (vitamin B6, metoclopramide, dimenhydrinate) and non-pharmacological (ginger, quince, acupressure, acupuncture) interventions might be effective in reducing symptoms of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy.

Abstract licence: CC BY

ObjectiveTo determine the antinausea and antiemetic effects of dimenhydrinate and maropitant in dogs when administered 60 minutes before hydromorphone and dexmedetomidine.Study designProspective, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial.AnimalsA total of 87 healthy client-owned dogs undergoing ovariectomy/castration.MethodsDogs were randomly assigned to be administered maropitant (1 mg kg-1; group M) subcutaneously (SC), dimenhydrinate (4 mg kg-1; group D) intramuscularly (IM), or 0.9% NaCl (0.1 mL kg-1; group C) SC 60 minutes before anesthetic premedication with hydromorphone (0.1 mg kg-1) and dexmedetomidine (5-15 μg kg-1) IM. Incidences of discomfort after injection of the treatment drug, nausea (ptyalism, lip licking, and swallowing), and vomiting/retching were documented. Scores for nausea and sedation were assigned immediately before premedication and for 20 minutes after premedication. Data were analyzed using Fisher's Exact test and Kruskal-Wallis test, with statistical significance set at pResultsDiscomfort to injection was significantly higher in group M (20/31, 64.5%) than in groups D (6/28, 21.4%) and C (2/28, 7.1%) (pConclusions and clinical relevanceDimenhydrinate produced no measurable antinausea and antiemetic effect when administered 60 minutes before hydromorphone and dexmedetomidine. Maropitant SC prevented hydromorphone-induced emesis but was ineffective in reducing nausea.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND