Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Dextran 70 + Glucose
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 2 · 1965–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Elemosho A, Malekzadeh H, Kluemper JC, et al.
2026
BackgroundReconstructive microsurgery has become a cornerstone in the management of complex tissue defects, yet many perioperative practices remain rooted in tradition rather than robust evidence. Persistent complications and variable protocols necessitate systematic evaluation of these dogmas to guide best practices.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive literature review of all major databases to identify all studies addressing techniques, perioperative care, monitoring, patient selection, and recovery in reconstructive microsurgery. Relevant studies were assessed and graded using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system. When available, meta-analyses and updated systematic reviews were prioritized; individual studies within such analyses were not separately reported to avoid redundancy.ResultsEight commonly held perioperative myths were critically appraised. Evidence demonstrates that judicious intraoperative vasopressor use does not increase flap compromise or loss. Perioperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, including cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, do not raise the risk of hematoma or thrombosis. Routine therapeutic anticoagulation or dextran use provides no benefit in flap survival and increases bleeding risk. High-dose perioperative steroids are associated with greater flap and wound complications. Extended antibiotic prophylaxis beyond 24 hours postoperatively does not reduce surgical site infections. Negative-pressure wound therapy is safe for free flaps. Most vascular compromises occur within 48-72 hours, supporting step-down monitoring thereafter. Finally, advanced age, diabetes, obesity, or immunosuppression due to solid organ transplantation or other reasons should not preclude patients from getting microsurgical reconstruction.ConclusionsMany entrenched perioperative practices in microsurgery lack contemporary evidence. Evidence-based adoption of updated protocols can minimize complications, standardize care, and improve outcomes in reconstructive microsurgery.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
A. Siakotos, G. Rouser
Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society, 1965
J. Schultz, S. Mansouri, I. Goldstein
Diabetes Care, 1982
K. B. Chalasani, G. Russell-Jones, A. Jain, et al.
Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2007
M. M. Ho-dac-Pannekeet, N. Schouten, Monique J. Langendijk, et al.
Kidney international, 1996
M. Atik
Archives of surgery, 1967
S. Jamwal, B. Ram, Sunita Ranote, et al.
International journal of biological macromolecules, 2019
R. Krediet, D. Struijk, G. Koomen, et al.
ASAIO transactions, 1991
A. Pfützner, Barbora Tencer, B. Stamm, et al.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023
Sahin Demirci, N. Sahiner
ChemCatChem, 2023
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.