Dalbavancin 500mg powder for solution for infusion vials
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Dalbavancin is a second-generation lipoglycopeptide antibiotic that was designed to improve on the natural glycopeptides currently available, such as vancomycin and teicoplanin [A4072, A4073].
Safety information for pregnancy and breastfeeding
Pregnancy
Breastfeeding
Always consult your doctor or midwife before taking any medicine during pregnancy or while breastfeeding. Source: DrugBank (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Dalbavancin
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Dalbavancin
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
View EudraVigilance report
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Dalbavancin
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Dalbavancin on the MHRA register
Xydalba 500mg powder for concentrate for solution for infusion vials
WHO defined daily dose (DDD)
1500 mg
Not a recommended dose. The DDD is the assumed average maintenance dose per day for a drug used for its main indication in adults. It is a statistical measure used for research and comparison purposes only.
Source: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, distributed via the NHS dm+d supplementary mapping files (NHSBSA). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(1)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 31 · Randomised trials: 6 · 2021–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Gavaruzzi F, Granata G, Capone A, et al.
2025
Background: Dalbavancin and oritavancin are long-acting lipoglycopeptides increasingly used off-label for a variety of Gram-positive infections. While their efficacy has been described in osteomyelitis, bacteremia, and infective endocarditis, evidence specifically addressing cardiovascular prosthetic infections such as prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections, left ventricular assist device infections (LVAD), and prosthetic vascular graft infections (PVGI) remains limited. These conditions are particularly challenging due to biofilm formation, difficulties in achieving surgical source control, and the frequent need for prolonged or suppressive therapy. Objectives: This systematic review aimed to summarize the available literature on the use of dalbavancin and oritavancin in cardiovascular prosthetic infections, with a focus on therapeutic strategies, clinical outcomes, and safety. Methods: We performed a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library up to 24 June 2025 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included adults treated with dalbavancin or oritavancin for cardiovascular prosthetic infections. Data on study characteristics, population demographics, causative pathogens, and microbiological profiles, antibiotic regimens, treatment duration, use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), indication or non-indication for chronic suppressive therapy, adverse events, clinical outcomes, and clinical efficacy were extracted. Results: Twenty studies comprising 113 patients were identified, of whom 111 received dalbavancin and 2 oritavancin. The main infections were PVE, CIED, LVAD, and PVGI. Dalbavancin was most effective as consolidation therapy after surgery or device removal, with high cure rates. Prolonged regimens were used as bridging or in partially treated cases, sometimes supported by TDM or PET/CT. Chronic suppressive therapy, mainly for LVAD and PVGI infections, achieved variable outcomes with relapses in about one fifth of patients. Adverse events were infrequent and generally mild. Conclusions: The included studies were highly diverse, conducted in various settings and with different objectives. Eight of the twenty included studies were single case reports on dalbavancin and oritavancin, highlighting the predominance of individual case descriptions in the available literature. Long-acting lipoglycopeptides may represent a valuable option for cardiovascular prosthetic infections. Their role appears most favorable as consolidation after adequate source control, while chronic suppressive use showed heterogeneous outcomes. This systematic review was registered on Open Science Framework. This work was supported by grants from the Italian Ministry of Health through Ricerca Corrente, Linea 3, Progetto 3.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Caselli D, Aricò M, Castagnola E, et al.
2025
ObjectivesThe aim of this work was to perform a systematic review assessing the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) properties of dalbavancin and the clinical use for in-label and off-label indications in pediatric patients.MethodsTwo authors independently searched the PubMed-MEDLINE and Scopus databases and clinicaltrials.gov up to 20 November 2024, to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, PK studies, and case series/reports assessing dalbavancin PK/PD properties or the clinical use for both in-label and off-label indications in pediatric patients. Data were independently extracted by the two authors, and the quality of the included studies was independently assessed by means of specific tools according to study design. Clinical success was selected as the primary outcome. Descriptive statistics were used for summarizing the retrieved data. Subgroup analysis according to PK/PD data, as well as in-label and off-label indications, was performed.ResultsAfter screening 206 articles, nine studies were included in the systematic review (one RCT, three PK studies, and five case series/reports; n = 267). Dalbavancin exposure was 30% lower in pediatric patients compared to adults. In acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs), the overall clinical success of dalbavancin was 96.1-97.3% and 92.9% in RCT and case series, respectively. Bone and joint infections (60.7%) and central-line-associated bloodstream infections (14.3%) represented the most common dalbavancin off-label indications in pediatric patients. Overall, the clinical success for off-label indications was 92.9%. The rate of adverse events ranged from 7.1% to 10.7%.ConclusionsOur systematic review summarized evidence concerning the PK/PD properties of dalbavancin and its use for in-label or off-label indications in pediatric patients. The available findings suggest that dalbavancin may be a valuable alternative for the management of ABSSSIs and/or off-label indications in pediatric patients according to efficacy and safety data, allowing for a potential minimized duration of hospital stay.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Tana C, Moffa L, Tana M, et al.
2026
Gram-positive infections are associated with significant morbidity and healthcare burden, often requiring prolonged intravenous therapy. Dalbavancin, a long-acting lipoglycopeptide, has emerged as a promising option beyond its approved indication for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD420261296328). MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science were searched from inception. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating dalbavancin in adult patients with Gram-positive infections were included. Outcomes of interest were clinical effectiveness, safety, and healthcare resource utilization. Risk of Bias was assessed using RoB 2 and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Twenty-one studies were included. Randomized trials confirmed non-inferior efficacy of dalbavancin compared with standard therapy in ABSSSI. Observational studies demonstrated high clinical success rates across a range of infections, including osteo-articular infections, bloodstream infections, and infective endocarditis (IE), particularly in acute settings. Lower effectiveness was observed in biofilm-related infections without adequate source control. Dalbavancin was frequently used as sequential or consolidation therapy in complex patients. Its use was consistently associated with reduced length of hospital stay, facilitation of outpatient management, and potential cost savings. The safety profile was favorable, including in prolonged or multi-dose regimens. In conclusion, dalbavancin represents an effective and well-tolerated option for Gram-positive infections, with expanding evidence supporting its use in complex and off-label settings. Its pharmacokinetic profile enables simplified treatment strategies and improved healthcare resource utilization, although appropriate patient selection and source control remain essential.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Lohana I, Jayramdass B
2026
Bhagyashree M. Gunjikar, Jawahar Manickam, D. Ghude
International Journal of Research and Review, 2024
Chaldoupis AE, Petrakis V, Ioannou P, et al.
2026
Thamer A. Almangour, M. Alrasheed
Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy, 2024
Nicholas A Turner, Toshimitsu Hamasaki, S. Doernberg, et al.
JAMA, 2025
N. Rebold, S. Alosaimy, J. Pearson, et al.
Infectious Diseases and Therapy, 2024
Jin Wang, Yun Cai, Yuhang Wang, et al.
2021
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Pharmacology and chemical data from DrugBank
Key facts
Drug status
Approved
Major interactions
None known
Half-life
346 hours
Mechanism
Dalbavancin has a spectrum and mechanism of action similar to vancomycin, a natu…
Food interactions
None known
Human targets
1 target
Data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Pharmacokinetics at a glance
Absorption
0-24h
Half-life
346 hours
Protein binding
93%
Volume of distribution
Metabolism
25%
Elimination
1000 mg
Clearance
0.0513 L/h
Pharmacokinetic data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Dalbavancin is not active against gram-negative bacteria; therefore, combination therapy may be clinically indicated if the ABSSSI is polymicrobial and includes a suspected or documented gram-negative pathogen [F2356].
To reduce the development of drug-resistant bacteria and maintain the effectiveness of dalbavancin and other antibacterial drugs, dalbavancin should be used only to treat infections that are proven or strongly suspected to be caused by susceptible bacteria [FDA Label, F2356]. When culture and susceptibility information are available, they should be considered in selecting or modifying antibacterial therapy [FDA Label, F2356]. In the absence of such data, local epidemiology and susceptibility patterns may contribute to the empiric selection of therapy [FDA Label, F2356].
Known interactions with other medicines. Always consult a healthcare professional.
Showing 50 of 54 interactions
There have been no adequate or well-controlled studies to conclude that use of dalbavancin is safe during pregnancy or breastfeeding [FDA Label, F2356].
Subsequently, the recommended dosage regimen of dalbavancin in patients with normal renal function is 1500 mg, administered either as a single dose, or 1000 mg followed one week later by 500 mg [FDA Label, F2356. Dalbavancin should be administered over 30 minutes by intravenous infusion [FDA Label, F2356].
Furthermore, inn a randomized, positive- and placebo-controlled, thorough QT/QTc study, 200 healthy subjects received either dalbavancin 1000 mg intravenous (IV), dalbavancin 1500 mg IV, oral moxifloxacin 400 mg, or placebo. Neither dalbavancin 1000 mg nor dalbavancin 1500 mg had any clinically relevant adverse effect on cardiac repolarization [FDA Label, F2356].
How the body processes this drug — absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination
No apparent accumulation of dalbavancin was observed following multiple IV infusions administered once weekly for up to eight weeks, with 1000 mg on Day 1 followed by up to seven weekly 500 mg doses, in healthy adults with normal renal function [FDA Label, F2356].
The metabolic pathways responsible for producing these metabolites have not been identified; however, due to the relatively minor contribution of metabolism to the overall elimination of dalbavancin, drug-drug interactions via inhibition or induction of metabolism of dalbavancin are not anticipated [FDA Label, F2356]. Hydroxy-dalbavancin and mannosyl aglycone show significantly less antibacterial activity compared to dalbavancin [FDA Label, F2356].
Proteins and enzymes this drug interacts with in the body
ATC J01XA04
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Show
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Linked compound data from DrugBank Open Data (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Dalbavancin
Additional database identifiers
Drugs Product Database (DPD)
13099
ChemSpider
30791917
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:9155
GenAtlas
PNLIP
GeneCards
PNLIP
GenBank Gene Database
J05125
GenBank Protein Database
339597
Guide to Pharmacology
2590
UniProt Accession
LIPP_HUMAN
DrugBank citations
If you use DrugBank data in your research, please cite:
- DrugBank 6.02024Recommended citationKnox C., Wilson M., Klinger C.M., et alDrugBank 6.0: the DrugBank Knowledgebase for 2024Nucleic Acids Res. 2024 Jan 552(D1):D1265-D1275
- DrugBank 5.02018Wishart D.S., Feunang Y.D., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Nov 846(D1):D1074-D1082
- DrugBank 4.02014Law V., Knox C., Djoumbou Y., et alDrugBank 4.0: shedding new light on drug metabolismNucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan 142(1):D1091-7
- DrugBank 3.02011Knox C., Law V., Jewison T., et alDrugBank 3.0: a comprehensive resource for 'omics' research on drugsNucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan39(Database issue):D1035-41
- DrugBank 2.02008Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets.Nucleic Acids Research2008 Jan36(Database issue):D901-6
- DrugBank 1.02006Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration.Nucleic Acids Research2006 Jan 134(Database issue):D668-72