Co-trimoxazole 80mg/400mg/5ml solution for infusion ampoules
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Co-trimoxazole
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
View EudraVigilance report
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Co-trimoxazole
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
6 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Co-trimoxazole on the MHRA register
Co-trimoxazole 80mg/400mg/5ml solution for infusion ampoules
Co-trimoxazole 80mg/400mg/5ml solution for infusion ampoules
Co-trimoxazole 80mg/400mg/5ml solution for infusion ampoules
Septrin for Infusion 80mg/400mg/5ml solution for infusion ampoules
Co-trimoxazole 80mg/400mg/5ml solution for infusion ampoules
Alliance Healthcare (Distribution) Ltd
This is the NHS Drug Tariff indicative price used for reimbursement purposes. It may not reflect the price paid by patients or pharmacies.
View full Drug TariffSource: NHS Drug Tariff via NHSBSA. Derived from dm+d VMPP (Virtual Medicinal Product Pack) pricing data. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Oral liquids
(2)Tablets & capsules
(2)Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(14)
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (acute exacerbation): antimicrobial prescribing (NG114)
Prostatitis (acute): antimicrobial prescribing (NG110)
Leg ulcer infection: antimicrobial prescribing (NG152)
Human and animal bites: antimicrobial prescribing (NG184)
Urinary tract infection (lower): antimicrobial prescribing (NG109)
Impetigo: antimicrobial prescribing (NG153)
Pyelonephritis (acute): antimicrobial prescribing (NG111)
Meningitis (bacterial) and meningococcal disease: recognition, diagnosis and management (NG240)
Urinary tract infection (recurrent): antimicrobial prescribing (NG112)
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in adults: diagnosis and management (CG163)
Cellulitis and erysipelas: antimicrobial prescribing (NG141)
Antimicrobial prescribing: delafloxacin for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ES32)
Diabetic foot problems: prevention and management (NG19)
Pneumonia: diagnosis and management (NG250)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 16 · Randomised trials: 22 · 1984–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
C. Chintu, G. Bhat, A. Walker, et al.
Lancet, 2004
X. Anglaret, G. Chêne, A. Attia, et al.
Lancet, 1999
J. Wharton, D. L. Coleman, C. Wofsy, et al.
Annals of internal medicine, 1986
L. Shulgina, A. Cahn, E. Chilvers, et al.
Thorax, 2012
J. Berkley, M. Ngari, J. Thitiri, et al.
The Lancet. Global Health, 2016
G. Schmitz, David Bruner, R. Pitotti, et al.
Annals of emergency medicine, 2010
Chuang-Wei Wang, W. Tassaneeyakul, Chun-Bing Chen, et al.
The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2020
- Genetic Predisposition to Disease
- Drug Hypersensitivity
- Anti-Infective Agents, Urinary
Assefa M, Girmay G
2024
BackgroundCo-trimoxazole is used as a prophylaxis for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients to prevent opportunistic infections. Its widespread use results in the emergence of co-trimoxazole resistance, which is a significant problem. This systematic review and meta-analysis determined the pooled prevalence of co-trimoxazole resistance among HIV-infected individuals in Ethiopia.MethodsThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was applied to report this study. The protocol has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under the assigned number CRD42024532240. Article search was performed using electronic databases such as PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Hinari, Web of Science, Science Direct, and African Journals Online. Data were extracted using a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and analyzed using STATA version 11.0 software. A random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled effect size of co-trimoxazole resistance across studies with a 95% confidence interval. The heterogeneity was checked using I2 statistic. The presence of publication bias was determined using a funnel plot and Egger's test with a p-value ResultsTwenty-two studies with 5,788 HIV-infected individuals were included. The pooled prevalence of co-trimoxazole resistance was 61.73% (95% CI: 53.10-70.37%), with heterogeneity (I2 = 87.7%) and statistical significance (p Escherichia coli; 70.86% (95% CI: 53.44-88.27%) followed by Salmonella spp.; 67.66% (95% CI: 41.51-93.81%) and Proteus spp.; 66.23% (95% CI: 34.65-97.82%).ConclusionThere is a higher prevalence of co-trimoxazole resistance in HIV-infected individuals in Ethiopia. This alarms WHO's recommendation of co-trimoxazole prophylaxis guidelines to review and update it. Additionally, a nationwide assessment of co-trimoxazole resistance in Ethiopia as a whole is required.Systematic review registration: identifier: CRD42024532240.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Embaye SM, Amaha ND, Muthoka EN, et al.
2023
Abstract Background: South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa account for about 90% of all diarrheal fatalities in children worldwide. The World Health Organization guideline suggests the use of co-trimoxazole in the management of bloody diarrhea, cholera, and invasive bacterial diarrhea in children. However, there are reports on the inappropriate and empirical use of co-trimoxazole for the management of diarrhea in Ethiopia. Our objective was to estimate the prevalence of bacterial resistance against co-trimoxazole from stool isolates of diarrheic children in Ethiopia and to identify the factors associated with it. Methods:We conducted a comprehensive database search in PubMed and Embase electronic databases to retrieve studies published between 2000 and 2021. We assessed heterogeneity across studies using Higgin's I² test statistic and Cochrane Q test. We used a random-effects model to pool the proportion of bacterial resistance. We evaluated publication bias using a funnel plot and Egger's regression test. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool was used to measure the quality of the papers included. Results: We included 20 eligible studies (1040 isolates) reporting the antimicrobial resistance of Shigella, Salmonella, E.coli,and Campylobacter against co-trimoxazole. The pooled proportion of co-trimoxazole resistance to the four diarrheagenic enteropathogens was 50.3 % with (95%CI: 41.7%-58.8%). We carried out a subgroup analysis based on four factors; bacterial species, participants’ age, region, study setting and sample size. The highest resistance was E. coli, 62.3 % (95%CI; 38%-83%) followed by Shigella 51.4% (95%CI; 38%-64%). There was a significant difference in the co-trimoxazole resistance of studies that had a sample size above 250 participants (58.5%) versus studies having a sample size below 250 (34.2%). However, there was no significant difference in co-trimoxazole resistance between children aged below 5 years compared with children above 5 years. Conclusion: Bacterial isolates from the stool of diarrheic Ethiopian children have shown resistance to co-trimoxazole. E. coli showed the highest resistance among the isolates. Therefore, we need to exercise caution in the over-the-counter use of co-trimoxazole and promote the rational use and prescribing practice of co-trimoxazole by healthcare providers. Prevention interventions such as safe drinking water, improved sanitation, and handwashing with soap can reduce disease risk and the use of antibiotic use. Additionally, breastfeeding and rotavirus vaccination can also reduce the incidence of acute gastroenteritis in young children. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42023281838.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Hakamifard A, Momenzadeh M
2026
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most important infectious complications in kidney transplant recipients; hence, antibiotic prophylaxis is warranted. Due to limited information for selection of an appropriate antibiotic for prophylaxis, as well as the varying reports concerning increasing resistance of Escherichia coli as the common related pathogen, this systematic review and meta-analysis assess the effect of a combined regimen including fluoroquinolone + co-trimoxazole as prophylaxis in high-risk group patients. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science were used as electronic databases to perform a systematic literature between 2010 and December 2024. A commercially available software program (EndNote X9) was used for electronic title management. Searches were performed with keywords, ("Urinary Tract Infections" OR "urinary tract infection" OR "UTI") AND ("Kidney Transplantation" OR "renal transplant*" OR "kidney transplant*") AND ("Co-Trimoxazole" OR "co-trimoxazole" OR "trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole" OR "TMP-SMX") AND ("Fluoroquinolones" OR "fluoroquinolone*" OR "ciprofloxacin" OR "levofloxacin"). A total of 454 potentially relevant titles and abstracts were found during the electronic and manual search, finally two studies were included. Heterogeneity showed a higher percentage of patients in Group I suffered from urinary infection, compared to Group II. Addition of ciprofloxacin to the standard regimen, co-trimoxazole, was related to a reduced risk of UTI in kidney transplant recipients.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-SA
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.