Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
11 branded products available
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 15 · Randomised trials: 15 · 1959–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
F. Messerli, Harikrishna Makani, A. Benjo, et al.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2011
- Antihypertensive Agents
- Hydrochlorothiazide
- Hypertension
Panagiotis I. Georgianos, Rajiv Agarwal
Diabetes Care, 2019
Mark A. Peterzan, Rebecca Hardy, Nish Chaturvedi, et al.
Hypertension, 2012
- Antihypertensive Agents
- Bendroflumethiazide
- Blood Pressure
Ian R. Reid, Ruth Ames, Brandon Orr‐Walker, et al.
The American Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Calcium
- Diuretics
- Femur Neck
Michael E. Ernst, Barry Carter, Shawn Zheng, et al.
American Journal of Hypertension, 2010
- Antihypertensive Agents
- Blood Pressure
- Cardiovascular Diseases
Strawbridge R, Ott M, Werneke U, et al.
2025
- Amiloride
- Polyuria
- Lithium Compounds
BACKGROUND: By entering collecting duct principal cells via the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC), lithium is capable of inducing vasopressin insensitivity, resulting in excessive urine production, nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (NDI) and potential for other long-term forms of renal dysfunction. ENaC inhibitors (ENaC-I) such as amiloride have been shown in animal models to minimise this adverse effect, and while ENaC-I are often considered an effective strategy, the literature on ENaC-I for lithium-related polyuria has not yet been synthesised despite the importance of this topic. This review aimed to identify all published evidence for adjunctive use of an ENaC-I for lithium-related polyuria to estimate its effectiveness while also exploring potential moderators of effectiveness. METHOD: The systematic search covered databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO complemented by handsearches, aiming to identify all studies of ENaC-I interventions in lithium-treated patients with pre- and post-ENaC-I polyuria as outcomes. RESULTS: 10 studies totalling 25 participants were eligible for inclusion and were synthesised narratively. Amiloride was the ENaC-I used in 24/25 participants, and triamterene in the other. 8/10 publications were single case reports, 4 of which presented substantial confounding issues. Clear improvements to polyuria were demonstrated in most papers, including the two larger studies. CONCLUSIONS: Although it appears very likely that ENaC inhibitors help ameliorate polyuria in lithium-treated patients, the quantity and quality of evidence is low. Heterogeneity in patient characteristics, intervention characteristics and study designs limit conclusions regarding the contribution of factors likely to influence ENaC-I effectiveness for lithium-induced polyuria. Besides, adverse effects require further exploration.
Abstract licence: CC BY
2026
Kumari U, Kaka M, Abbas F, et al.
2026
Aggarwal P, Oza RR, Solanki H, et al.
2025
- Hypertension
- Chlorthalidone
- Hydrochlorothiazide
Aulia Rahmawati, Belinda Ardelia Rahma Desyta, Kharisma Putri Utami, et al.
Journal of Basic Medical Veterinary, 2026
Diuretics alleviate fluid retention and electrolyte abnormalities; however, comparative preclinical animal studies remain limited. This systematic review evaluated the effects of loop diuretics (furosemide), thiazide diuretics (hydrochlorothiazide), and potassium-sparing agents (amiloride, triamterene) on renal function, electrolyte balance, and survival in rats. PRISMA 2020 guidelines were followed to search PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for comparative studies published between 2015 and 2025 investigating diuretic effects on glomerular filtration rate, creatinine clearance, urinary sodium/potassium/chloride excretion, plasma electrolytes, kidney injury biomarkers, and survival in rats. Dual screening and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers, and risk of bias was assessed using the ARRIVE 2.0 checklist. Twelve studies (440 rats) were included. Thiazides (1.3–2.0-fold) and potassium-sparing agents (1.1–1.4-fold) increased urine volume less than loop diuretics (2.8–3.5-fold). Loop diuretics increased urinary potassium excretion and reduced plasma potassium to clinically dangerous levels (2.3–2.5 mmol/L), increasing the risk of hypokalemia by 2.3–3.2-fold. Thiazides showed moderate efficacy but also posed a significant risk of hypokalemia (1.5–1.9-fold K⁺ loss). Combination therapy with loop and potassium-sparing agents increased diuretic efficacy by 30–94% and reduced electrolyte disturbances by 30–50%. Diuretic resistance (approximately a 25% reduction in efficiency) was associated with aldosterone-mediated epithelial sodium channel overexpression during days 5–7 of chronic therapy. Aldosterone-deficient animals responded more favorably to diuretics. In disease models, furosemide promoted medullary damage in acute ischemia–reperfusion injury but improved survival in chronic renal failure (43–82% reduction in kidney injury biomarkers and 75–100% improvement with combination therapy). Metabolomic analyses indicated that outer medullary osmolyte depletion (betaine 89%, glycerophosphocholine 46–63%) contributed to impaired urine concentration. Prolonged furosemide use also resulted in significant micronutrient depletion (magnesium 16–33%, iron 52%, copper 31%). Effective loop diuretic therapy requires careful electrolyte monitoring. Combination therapy, particularly with loop and potassium-sparing diuretics, appears to be the most effective and safest strategy. Diuretic resistance caused by aldosterone-mediated sodium channel activation may be reduced through intermittent dosing, sodium restriction, or renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system antagonism. Future research should investigate long-term treatment protocols, combination regimens, disease-specific responses, and metabolomic standardization to optimize clinical diuretic therapy.
Abstract licence: CC BY-SA
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.