Co-tenidone 100mg/25mg tablets
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Co-tenidone
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
27 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Co-tenidone on the MHRA register
Tenoretic 100mg/25mg tablets
Co-tenidone 100mg/25mg tablets
Co-tenidone 100mg/25mg tablets
Co-tenidone 100mg/25mg tablets
Co-tenidone 100mg/25mg tablets
Co-tenidone 100mg/25mg tablets
Co-tenidone 100mg/25mg tablets
Co-tenidone 100mg/25mg tablets
Co-tenidone 100mg/25mg tablets
Co-tenidone 100mg/25mg tablets
This is the NHS Drug Tariff indicative price used for reimbursement purposes. It may not reflect the price paid by patients or pharmacies.
View full Drug TariffSource: NHS Drug Tariff via NHSBSA. Derived from dm+d VMPP (Virtual Medicinal Product Pack) pricing data. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Oral liquids
(2)Tablets & capsules
(1)Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(10)
Human and animal bites: antimicrobial prescribing (NG184)
Prostatitis (acute): antimicrobial prescribing (NG110)
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (acute exacerbation): antimicrobial prescribing (NG114)
Familial hypercholesterolaemia: identification and management (CG71)
Pyelonephritis (acute): antimicrobial prescribing (NG111)
Antimicrobial prescribing: delafloxacin for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ES32)
Bronchiectasis (non-cystic fibrosis), acute exacerbation: antimicrobial prescribing (NG117)
Spasticity in under 19s: management (CG145)
Gout: diagnosis and management (NG219)
Preterm labour and birth (NG25)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 9 · Randomised trials: 16 · 1981–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
B. Carlberg, O. Samuelsson, L. Lindholm
Lancet, 2004
B. Dahlö;f, P. S. Sever, N. Poulter, et al.
Lancet, 2005
L. Lindholm, H. Ibsen, B. Dahlö;f, et al.
Lancet, 2002
B. Dahlof, B. Devereux, S. Kjeldsen
Acc Current Journal Review, 2002
B. Chaitman, C. Pepine, J. O. Parker, et al.
JAMA, 2004
R. Lacro, H. Dietz, Lisa Wruck, et al.
American heart journal, 2007
R. Agarwal, Arjun D. Sinha, Maria K. Pappas, et al.
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association, 2014
Björn Dahlöf, Richard B Devereux, Sverre E Kjeldsen, et al.
The Lancet, 2002
A. Forteza, A. Evangelista, V. Sánchez, et al.
European heart journal, 2016
Hu J, Pan L, Kong H, et al.
2026
- Hemangioma
- Skin Neoplasms
- Atenolol
ObjectiveThis study aimed to systematically evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of propranolol versus atenolol, corticosteroids, timolol, and other therapies in the treatment of infantile hemangioma (IH) through a meta-analysis, thereby providing evidence-based guidance for clinical practice.MethodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang databases from inception to December 2025. The protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD420261294316). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or clinical controlled trials (CCTs) comparing oral propranolol with other active drugs in IH patients aged ≤ 12 years were included. Primary outcomes were overall response rate (≥ 50% reduction), complete remission rate, and incidence of adverse events. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using R software. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.ResultsEight studies involving 900 patients (propranolol: 464; control: 436) were included. Meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in overall response rate between propranolol and control groups (pooled OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 0.80-2.09, p = 0.30). However, propranolol demonstrated a significantly higher complete remission rate (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.01-1.82, p = 0.045). Subgroup analyses by control drug type (atenolol, corticosteroids, timolol, combination therapy) showed no significant differences in efficacy (all p > 0.05). Safety analysis indicated no significant difference in adverse event incidence between groups (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.38-1.55, p = 0.45), albeit with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 56%). Heterogeneity was low for efficacy outcomes (I2 = 0%). Funnel plot symmetry and a non-significant Egger's test suggested a low risk of publication bias.ConclusionPropranolol offers a statistically significant advantage in achieving complete remission of infantile hemangioma compared to other active agents, while maintaining comparable overall response rates and a similar overall safety profile. These findings support propranolol as a first-line therapy when complete lesion resolution is the primary goal. Atenolol represents an effective alternative, particularly for patients with specific tolerability concerns, underscoring the need for individualized treatment selection.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.