Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Co-fluampicil
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
19 branded products available
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 7 · Randomised trials: 8 · 1975–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Benjamin A Lipsky, K. Itani, C. Norden
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2004
Sugimoto Y, Sasaki R, Tominaga M, et al.
2026
Griffin NA, Epperson AB, Awad ME, et al.
2025
Acute Systemic Antimicrobial Prophylaxis (ASAP) is the standard of care for managing open fractures. There is concern that protocols do not address the modern open fracture bioburden. Online databases were searched to estimate the effect size in reducing the risk of postoperative infections in open fracture management stratified by regimen and fracture classification. 2,031 patients from 17 studies were analyzed. Meta-analysis of Type III open fractures suggested that Flucloxacillin + Benzylpenicillin had a lower infection rate than Cefazolin + Gentamicin; furthermore, the duration of hospitalization was extended by four days with Cefazolin + Gentamicin in Type II/III open fractures. No one antibiotic prophylactic regimen can be recommended over another in the management of open fractures with the current available data. We offer methodological guidelines for future trials that will allow robust evidence for future studies.
Abstract licence: CC BY
I. Klare, C. Konstabel, S. Mueller-Bertling, et al.
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2005
E. Wallenburg, R. Brüggemann, J. Roberts, et al.
Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2021
R. Asghar, S. Banajeh, Josefina Egas, et al.
BMJ : British Medical Journal, 2008
R. Brindle, O. Williams, P. Davies, et al.
BMJ Open, 2017
2026
- Staphylococcus aureus
- Bacteremia
- Staphylococcal Infections
Abu Shqara R, Glikman D, Goldinfeld G, et al.
2026
- Endometritis
- Chorioamnionitis
- Ampicillin
Takeda K, Takazono T, Ashizawa N, et al.
2026
- Ampicillin
- Sulbactam
- Fluoroquinolones
IntroductionCommunity-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in older adults in Japan. Prolonged hospitalisation accelerates functional decline, promotes the progression of frailty and increases the need for long-term care. An early switch from intravenous to oral antibiotics helps achieve clinical outcomes comparable to those of continued intravenous therapy while shortening hospital stays. For older adults with frailty, avoiding unnecessary hospitalisation may help prevent further deterioration of functional status. Demonstrating non-inferiority of oral antibiotics for clinical cure would help clinicians recommend the use of switch therapy to shorten hospital stay and improve functional outcomes in this high-risk population. This study aimed to evaluate the non-inferiority of lascufloxacin switch therapy to intravenous ampicillin/sulbactam in older adults with frailty and CAP.Methods and analysisThis multicentre randomised open-label trial enrols older adults with mild to moderate CAP and frailty according to the Frailty Screening Index. Participants will be randomised using minimisation with the Age, Dehydration, Respiratory Failure, Orientation Disturbance and Low Blood Pressure score and Frailty Screening Index as allocation factors to receive either lascufloxacin switch therapy or ampicillin/sulbactam intravenous. The primary endpoint is the clinical cure rate at the test of cure. Secondary endpoints include early clinical response, end-of-treatment response, hospital stay, medical costs, clinical stability, 30-day mortality or recurrence and microbiological outcomes. The planned sample size is 80 patients per group.Ethics and disseminationThis study was approved by the Certified Review Board of Nagasaki University, Japan. These results will be disseminated through scientific presentations and publications.Trial registration numberjRCTs071250072 (https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs071250072).
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.