Co-amoxiclav 250mg/125mg tablets
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Co-amoxiclav
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
33 branded products available
Part of the Augmentin brand family (generic: Co-amoxiclav)
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Co-amoxiclav on the MHRA register
Augmentin 375mg tablets
Augmentin 375mg tablets
Co-amoxiclav 250mg/125mg tablets
Co-amoxiclav 250mg/125mg tablets
Co-amoxiclav 250mg/125mg tablets
Co-amoxiclav 250mg/125mg tablets
Co-amoxiclav 250mg/125mg tablets
Co-amoxiclav 250mg/125mg tablets
Co-amoxiclav 250mg/125mg tablets
Co-amoxiclav 250mg/125mg tablets
Co-amoxiclav 250mg/125mg tablets
Co-amoxiclav 250mg/125mg tablets
This is the NHS Drug Tariff indicative price used for reimbursement purposes. It may not reflect the price paid by patients or pharmacies.
View full Drug TariffSource: NHS Drug Tariff via NHSBSA. Derived from dm+d VMPP (Virtual Medicinal Product Pack) pricing data. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
WHO defined daily dose (DDD)
1.5 gram
Not a recommended dose. The DDD is the assumed average maintenance dose per day for a drug used for its main indication in adults. It is a statistical measure used for research and comparison purposes only.
Source: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, distributed via the NHS dm+d supplementary mapping files (NHSBSA). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(15)
Bronchiectasis (non-cystic fibrosis), acute exacerbation: antimicrobial prescribing (NG117)
Human and animal bites: antimicrobial prescribing (NG184)
Pyelonephritis (acute): antimicrobial prescribing (NG111)
Sinusitis (acute): antimicrobial prescribing (NG79)
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (acute exacerbation): antimicrobial prescribing (NG114)
Leg ulcer infection: antimicrobial prescribing (NG152)
Otitis media (acute): antimicrobial prescribing (NG91)
Cellulitis and erysipelas: antimicrobial prescribing (NG141)
Impetigo: antimicrobial prescribing (NG153)
Urinary tract infection (catheter-associated): antimicrobial prescribing (NG113)
Clostridium difficile infection: risk with broad-spectrum antibiotics (ESMPB1)
Pneumonia: diagnosis and management (NG250)
Diverticular disease: diagnosis and management (NG147)
Diabetic foot problems: prevention and management (NG19)
Caesarean birth (NG192)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 17 · Randomised trials: 26 · 1999–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Sho Suzuki, T. Gotoda, Chika Kusano, et al.
Gut, 2020
C. Vons, C. Barry, S. Maître, et al.
Lancet, 2011
Caiping Gao, Di Zhang, Ting Zhang, et al.
Helicobacter, 2020
R. Finch, D. Schürmann, O. Collins, et al.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2002
Wenlin Zhang, Boshen Lin, Yueyue Li, et al.
Digestion, 2023
I. Anastopoulos, I. Pashalidis, A. Orfanos, et al.
Journal of environmental management, 2020
A. Huttner, J. Bielicki, Michelle N Clements, et al.
Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2019
Yaobin Ouyang, Minghui Wang, Yu-ling Xu, et al.
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2022
Potter-Schwartz L, Swe MM, Sharland M, et al.
2026
- Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination
- Amoxicillin
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
ObjectivesThe aim of this study is to evaluate existing evidence on the effectiveness of amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate for community-acquired pneumonia in children and adults.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesPubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Ovid-MEDLINER were searched with no language restrictions through 16 July 2024.Eligibility criteriaWe included studies comparing the effectiveness of amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanate versus other antibiotics or placebo.Data extraction and synthesisOnly randomised controlled trials comparing amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanate with another antibiotic or placebo with a primary outcome of clinical resolution or clinical failure were eligible for our review. We used random-effects and fixed-effects logistic regression models to estimate the pooled treatment effect size. Heterogeneity of the studies was evaluated using the τ statistic. We performed an unplanned frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis for the indirect comparison between amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate. The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials was used to assess and categorise studies into low risk of bias, some concerns or high risk of bias.ResultsWe extracted data from 44 studies including 45 400 patients. We found no evidence of a differential effect on clinical resolution when comparing amoxicillin with other antibiotics (n=15 trials; pooled OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.56 to 1.38, where >1 favours amoxicillin) or amoxicillin-clavulanate with other antibiotics (n=17; OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.76 to 1.04). Similarly, evidence of difference in clinical failure between amoxicillin and other antibiotics was unclear and unable to rule out clinically important benefits or harms (n=8; OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.06, where 1 favours amoxicillin-clavulanate). Sixty-three per cent and 29% of amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate studies, respectively, had low risk of bias according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials.ConclusionsCurrent evidence is unclear as to whether amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanate differs from other antibiotics, or from each other, in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, owing to the small number of trials and substantial heterogeneity in comparators used across study settings.Prospero registration numberCRD42024568554.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Shih CA, Wu IT, Wu DC, et al.
2026
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.