Clobetasone 0.05% ointment
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Clobetasone is a corticosteroid that is often employed topically as a treatment for a variety of conditions such as eczema, psoriasis, various forms of dermatitis, and also for certain ophthalmologic conditions.
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Clobetasone
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
View EudraVigilance report
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Clobetasone
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
5 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Clobetasone on the MHRA register
Clobavate 0.05% ointment
Eumovate 0.05% ointment
This is the NHS Drug Tariff indicative price used for reimbursement purposes. It may not reflect the price paid by patients or pharmacies.
View full Drug TariffSource: NHS Drug Tariff via NHSBSA. Derived from dm+d VMPP (Virtual Medicinal Product Pack) pricing data. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(1)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 2 · Randomised trials: 1 · 1975–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
J. Glees, H. Mameghan-Zadeh, C. Sparkes
Clinical radiology, 1979
- Administration, Topical
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents
- Betamethasone
Mani Mala, Richi Sinha, R. K. Singh
Cureus, 2025
Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of postoperative medicated mastoid cavity packing on healing outcomes following canal wall down (CWD) mastoidectomy compared to no packing. Methods This prospective observational study included 125 patients undergoing CWD mastoidectomy, matched for age and sex, and assigned to two groups. Group A (n=62) received medicated mastoid cavity packing containing ofloxacin, ornidazole, clobetasone propionate, and itraconazole on postoperative days 0, 10, and 20. Group B (n=63) received no postoperative packing. Healing outcomes were evaluated and compared between the groups on postoperative days 45, 75, and 105. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The groups were comparable in age and sex distribution. The packed group demonstrated significantly higher rates of complete epithelialization on day 45 (48.4% vs. 15.9%, p < 0.0001) and day 75 (72.6% vs. 49.2%, p = 0.007), with no difference observed by day 105. Graft uptake duration was similar between groups (76.94 days in Group A and 76.19 days in Group B). Granulation tissue, mucosal folds, and otorrhea were more frequent in the non-packed group (25.4%, 6.3%, and 4.8% vs 12.9%, 3.2%, and 3.2%, respectively) during early follow-up, though not statistically significant. Mean epithelialization time was significantly shorter in the packed group (84.0 vs. 92.8 days, p = 0.001). Conclusion Medicated mastoid cavity packing promotes earlier epithelialization following CWD mastoidectomy and is associated with a lower incidence of granulation tissue without affecting graft uptake. It offers particular benefits in low-resource settings by enhancing healing and reducing follow-up needs. Larger studies are warranted to establish standardized postoperative care protocols.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Danh Le Quang, Sau Nguyen Huu, Anh Mai Ba Hoang
Journal of Medicine and Pharmacy, 2024
Background: Nodule is an inflammatory lesion common in scabies, treating nodular scabies is a challenge. We conducted this study to evaluate the results of treating nodular scabies with Clobetasone butyrate 0.05% in children at the National Dermatology Hospital. Material and methods: Randomized controlled clinical trial study on 100 patients diagnosed with scabies at the age of 2 - 15 years at the National Dermatology Hospital. The study group used Clobetasone butyrate 0.05% with Desloratidine, the control group used Cetaphil Moisturizing with Desloratidine, evaluating the treatment effect after two weeks. Results: The number of nodular lesions in the study group before treatment was 8.72 ± 8.93 and after treatment decreased to 4.2 ± 3.5. In the control group, the number of nodules before treatment was 9.8 ± 9, and after treatment reduced to 6.7 ± 6.5. After two weeks of treatment, the number of nodules decreased with statistical significance in the study group. Treatment response in the study group showed good, average, fair and poor results of 12%, 66%, 22%, 0% respectively; while the control group was 0%, 4%, 46%, 50%; The difference is statistically significant in the two groups. Itching symptom in the study group improved better than the control group. No side effects were recorded in either group. Conclusion: Treatment of nodular scabies with Clobetasone butyrate 0.05% in children reduced the number of lesions, itching symptoms after two weeks and had not recorded any side effects. Key words: Scabies, nodular scabies, Clobetasone butyrate
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Huq S, Noor T, Hena Chowdhury A, et al.
2026
Background Tapinarof 1% cream, a non-steroidal topical aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) agonist, has demonstrated effectiveness in the treatment of psoriasis. However, real-world data from low-resource settings is scarce. This study evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of tapinarof 1% cream in adults with mild to moderate plaque psoriasis, and it explored differences in outcomes between tapinarof monotherapy and tapinarof combined with a moderately potent topical corticosteroid (clobetasone butyrate). Between-group comparisons were prespecified as exploratory and associative due to non-random allocation. Methods In this prospective observational study, 122 patients with confirmed plaque psoriasis received tapinarof monotherapy (n = 72) or combination therapy with topical corticosteroids (n = 50). Disease severity was assessed using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and Physician Global Assessment (PGA) at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, and 12. PASI75 and PASI90 responses were analyzed using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Multivariable-adjusted and longitudinal sensitivity analyses were performed. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Results At week 12, mean PASI decreased from 6.02 ± 2.40 to 2.78 ± 1.28 in the monotherapy group (p = 0.045) and from 6.46 ± 2.06 to 1.38 ± 1.14 in the combination group (p < 0.001), with a significant between-group difference (p < 0.001). PASI75 was achieved by 30 (60.0%) patients in the combination group and 10 (13.9%) in the monotherapy group (OR = 6.25, 95% CI: 2.38-16.67; p < 0.001). PASI90 responses occurred in 14 (28.0%) and six (8.3%) patients, respectively (OR = 4.35, 95% CI: 1.52-12.50; p = 0.043). Mean changes in PGA differed between groups (p = 0.038). AEs were mild and similar across groups. Conclusion Combination therapy was associated with greater clinical improvement than tapinarof monotherapy in this observational cohort; however, these findings represent associations rather than causal effects, and the incremental contribution of tapinarof cannot be isolated because the combination arm included topical corticosteroids. Randomized studies are required to confirm comparative effectiveness.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Ogunbiyi O, Mawani NM, Walker SL
2025
A 28-year-old woman presented with a 4-day history of a sudden-onset painful rash on both arms, diarrhea, and a hoarse voice after recent travel to Senegal and the Gambia. The symptoms started on the second day of her trip to the Gambia. There was no relevant past medical history. On examination, there were multiple erythematous and hyperpigmented patches with mild peripheral scaling on the right upper limb, the medial aspect of the left arm, and the left breast. The rest of the physical examination was normal. Photographs of early lesions showed central desquamation. The distribution of the lesions on the distal right arm and proximal right forearm (Figure 1A) and those on the left arm and breast (Figure 1B) exhibited the characteristics of “kissing lesions.” These are discrete, well-defined lesions occurring in mirror-image locations on opposing skin surfaces. 1 This is consistent with a diagnosis of paederus dermatitis, likely acquired in the Gambia. 2 The rash was treated with clobetasone butyrate 0.05% cream twice daily and emollients. The diarrhea and hoarse voice resolved spontaneously. Salmonella DNA was detected in the stool. A respiratory viral swab result was negative, and HIV and syphilis serology results were also negative. Paederus dermatitis is an acute irritant dermatitis caused by contact with the hemolymph of rove beetles ( Paederus sp), which contain a vesicant toxin called pederin. 3 Direct skin contact is not necessary; lesions often appear in areas where the beetle has been crushed or moved. Paederus species are widely distributed, and outbreaks have
Abstract licence: CC BY
Sisane Souliyanh, Anh Mai Bá Hoàng, Phương Phạm Thị Minh, et al.
Tạp chí Da liễu học Việt Nam, 2024
P. Goustas, MJ Cork, D. Higson
Journal of Dermatological Treatment, 2003
- Acute Disease
- Administration, Cutaneous
- Administration, Topical
P Goustas, MJ Cork, D Higson
Journal of Dermatological Treatment, 2003
Albert Wolkerstorfer, M. A. Strobos, Eltjo J. Glazenburg, et al.
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1998
- Fluticasone
- Administration, Topical
- Androstadienes
Pasquale Aragona, Rosaria Spinella, Laura Rania, et al.
European Journal of Ophthalmology, 2012
- Administration, Topical
- Clobetasol
- Conjunctiva
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Pharmacology and chemical data from DrugBank
Key facts
Drug status
Approved
Major interactions
None known
Half-life
Not available
Mechanism
Topically applied clobeyasone are thought to bind with cytoplasmic receptors in…
Food interactions
None known
Human targets
1 target
Data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Pharmacokinetics at a glance
Absorption
Half-life
Volume of distribution
Metabolism
Elimination
Pharmacokinetic data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
In ophthalmology, clobetasone butyrate 0.1% eye drops have been shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of dry eyes in Sjögren's Syndrome.
Known interactions with other medications. Always consult a healthcare professional.
Showing 50 of 164 interactions
Test type: LD50 Oral (Reported dose: >6gm/kg)
LD50 Subcutaneous ( >3600mg/kg )
Effects : Behavioral : somnolence ( general depressed activity )
Blood changes in spleen
Organism : Mouse
Test type: LD50
Route: Intraperitoneal
Reported dose: 500 mg/kg
LD50 rat : 1510mg/kg Intraperitoneal
LD50 rat >6gm/kg Oral
LD 50 rat : > 2600mg/kg subcutaneous
How the body processes this drug — absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination
Proteins and enzymes this drug interacts with in the body
PMID:27120390 PMID:37478846
Has a dual mode of action: as a transcription factor that binds to glucocorticoid response elements (GRE), both for nuclear and mitochondrial DNA, and as a modulator of other transcription factors .
PMID:28139699
Affects inflammatory responses, cellular proliferation and differentiation in target tissues. Involved in chromatin remodeling .
PMID:9590696
Plays a role in rapid mRNA degradation by binding to the 5' UTR of target mRNAs and interacting with PNRC2 in a ligand-dependent manner which recruits the RNA helicase UPF1 and the mRNA-decapping enzyme DCP1A, leading to RNA decay .
PMID:25775514
Could act as a coactivator for STAT5-dependent transcription upon growth hormone (GH) stimulation and could reveal an essential role of hepatic GR in the control of body growth (By similarity)
Enzymes involved in drug metabolism — important for understanding drug interactions
ATC D07AB01
ATC S01CA11
ATC S01BA09
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Show
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Linked compound data from DrugBank Open Data (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Clobetasone
Additional database identifiers
Drugs Product Database (DPD)
7557
ChemSpider
64482
ZINC
ZINC000005752185
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:7978
GenAtlas
NR3C1
GeneCards
NR3C1
GenBank Gene Database
X03225
GenBank Protein Database
31680
Guide to Pharmacology
625
UniProt Accession
GCR_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:2637
GenAtlas
CYP3A4
GeneCards
CYP3A4
GenBank Gene Database
M18907
Guide to Pharmacology
1337
UniProt Accession
CP3A4_HUMAN
DrugBank citations
If you use DrugBank data in your research, please cite the following publications:
Show earlier publications
Structured knowledge from the free knowledge base
Linked open data from Wikidata (Q5134764), a free and open knowledge base operated by the Wikimedia Foundation. Data is available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication.