Chikungunya vaccine (live) powder and solvent for solution for injection 0.5ml vials
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is a member of the Alphavirus genus that was first identified in Tanzania in 1952.[A262051] It is spread primarily by the bite of infected mosquitos of the <em>Aedes</em> genus.
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Chikungunya vaccine
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 28 · Randomised trials: 12 · 1971–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Schneider M, Narciso-Abraham M, Hadl S, et al.
2023
- Chikungunya virus
- Chikungunya Fever
- Vaccines, Attenuated
Katrin Ramsauer, M. Schwameis, C. Firbas, et al.
The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2015
E. Reisinger, Roland Tschismarov, E. Beubler, et al.
Lancet, 2018
Thaíse Yasmine Vasconcelos de Lima Cavalcanti, M. R. Pereira, S. D. de Paula, et al.
Viruses, 2022
Quan Minh Tran, James Soda, Amir Siraj, et al.
Vaccine, 2023
- Vaccines
- Chikungunya Fever
- Disease Outbreaks
Kerstin Kling, Annika Falman, Lisa Branke, et al.
Vaccine, 2026
- Chikungunya virus
- Viral Vaccines
- Vaccines, Virus-Like Particle
M. Berrueta, Agustín Ciapponi, A. Mazzoni, et al.
Reproductive Health, 2025
Chikungunya virus significantly impacts public health, primarily affecting regions in Africa and the Americas (predominantly Latin America and the Caribbean). Despite the global spread of the virus and its clinical manifestations and complications in vulnerable populations such as children and pregnant persons, no widely available vaccine is currently available. With recent advancements in vaccine development, there is a need to systematically evaluate the emerging evidence on the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of chikungunya vaccine candidates. This protocol outlines a living systematic review designed to continuously assess the growing research on chikungunya vaccines, focusing on diverse populations, including children and pregnant persons. We aim to provide up-to-date evidence to inform public health decisions and vaccine recommendations as new data is available. Our objective is to carry out a living systematic review and meta-analysis through biweekly searches in medical databases and clinical trial registries, aiming to identify relevant chikungunya vaccines studies on pregnant individuals, children, and adolescents. Pairs of reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data, and assess the risk of bias. Clinical trials, quasi-experimental studies, and observational studies, including case reports, will be considered for inclusion. Main outcomes will include the safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of chikungunya vaccines in pregnant individuals (including neonatal outcomes), as well as in children and adolescents. Reactogenicity and immunogenicity will be considered as secondary outcomes. Paired meta-analyses, incorporating predefined subgroup and sensitivity analyses, will be performed. Evidence certainty will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. This living systematic review and meta-analysis will continuously assess the safety, immunogenicity, and effectiveness of chikungunya vaccines in pregnant persons, children, and adolescents. Given the significant disease burden and potential complications in these populations, synthesizing emerging evidence is crucial for guiding immunization policies and clinical recommendations. By maintaining an updated analysis, this review will provide timely insights for public health agencies, researchers, and clinicians involved in vaccine implementation and maternal-child health. Two protocols were registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database, CRD42024514513 and CRD42024516754.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Abbasi E
2026
Arboviral diseases, transmitted primarily by Aedes mosquitoes, represent a growing global health challenge. The spread of dengue, Zika, chikungunya, and yellow fever has been associated with factors such as climate change, urbanization, and increased global mobility. We conducted a systematic review of the literature published between January 2000 and December 2024, screening 487 studies, of which 11 met predefined inclusion criteria and were included in the final synthesis (PROSPERO registration: CRD42021231605). The review integrates evidence from epidemiological reports, molecular surveillance studies, and evaluations of control strategies across endemic and emerging regions. Findings indicate a marked geographic expansion of major arboviruses beyond traditional endemic zones, with multiple studies reporting substantial increases in incidence in temperate regions over the past two decades. Molecular analyses consistently demonstrate high genetic diversity and ongoing viral evolution, reflecting adaptation to environmental and host pressures. The review also highlights persistent challenges in disease control, including widespread insecticide resistance, uneven surveillance capacity, and limitations in vaccine deployment. Emerging interventions such as Wolbachia-based vector control, genetically modified mosquitoes, and newer dengue and chikungunya vaccines show promise but require integration within broader surveillance, health-system, and governance frameworks. Overall, the findings underscore the need for coordinated, multisectoral approaches to strengthen early detection, improve control strategies, and mitigate the growing global burden of arboviral diseases.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Li Yutong, Jiang Feng, Zhao Danting, et al.
2025
Abstract Background Since July 2025, there have been outbreaks of chikungunya fever in some parts of China, which has drawn widespread social attention. Vaccination is the most economical and effective means of preventing and controlling infectious diseases. Currently, there are two chikungunya fever vaccines approved for marketing worldwide, and there is still a lack of systematic review and analysis of the immunogenicity and safety of this vaccine. Objective Compare the levels in immunogenicity and safety of Chikungunya (CHIKV) vaccine. Methods Computerized searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science (WOS), Scopus, Cochrane Library and Clinicaltrials.gov for randomized controlled trials on the implementation of CHIKV vaccines in human populations. The search period was from the establishment of the databases to August 2025. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias in the included studies. Data analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1 software. Results In terms of immunogenicity, the results showed that there was a statistically significant difference in seroreponse rate: RR =12.22 (95% CI : 9.05∼16.51, I 2 =89%, P <0.00001), as well as GMR: RR =13.88 (95% CI : 4.12∼46.79, I 2 =0%, P <0.00001). In the meta-analysis of safety indicators, there was a statistically significant differences in any adverse reactions: RR =1.30(95% CI : 1.18∼1.42, I 2 =45%, P <0.00001). The meta-analysis results of local adverse reactions showed that there was a statistically significant differences in any local adverse reactions: RR =1.61 (95% CI :1.42∼1.82, I 2 =67%, P < 0.00001), as well as injection site pain: RR =1.83 (95% CI : 1.46∼2.28, I 2 =38%, P < 0.00001). The results showed that there were statistically significant difference in systemic solicited adverse events: RR =1.54(95% CI :1.44∼1.66, I 2 =87%, P <0.00001), as well as their common manifestations(including headache, fatigue, myalgia, arthralgia, nausea, fever). Conclusion CHIKV vaccine has demonstrated well immunogenicity. However, further research is still needed on the adverse events following vaccination. Author Summary Chikungunya fever, as a neglected tropical disease, experienced a relatively severe outbreak in the Guangdong region of China in 2025. Vaccination, as the most effective vaccination method, currently only has two approved vaccines globally. This study systematically reviewed the published RCTs results of different technical routes of chikungunya fever vaccines that have been on the market and are still in clinical trials, to understand, analyze and master the various immunogenicity and safety data of chikungunya fever vaccines. Study found that vaccination with the chikungunya fever vaccine was able to induce strong neutralizing antibodies and demonstrated an excellent seroreponse rate. However, in terms of safety, some significant adverse reactions were observed, especially in the overall adverse reaction rates such as headache, fatigue, muscle pain, fever, etc., as well as the local adverse reaction rates such as pain at the injection site. This inspires us to pay more attention to the safety of chikungunya fever vaccines in the future vaccine research and development process.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Vazquez J, Avilés-Robles M, Chacón-Cruz E, et al.
2026
Background: Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is a mosquito-borne alphavirus transmitted predominantly by Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Infection is characterized by an acute febrile illness accompanied by debilitating polyarthralgia, myalgia, and cutaneous manifestations. Although the acute syndrome is usually self-limited, a substantial proportion of patients experience persistent musculoskeletal symptoms that may progress to chronic inflammatory arthritis, resulting in prolonged disability and impaired quality of life. Objective: To summarize current evidence on the epidemiology, virology, immunopathogenesis, clinical manifestations, laboratory diagnosis, prevention, and vaccine development of CHIKV, with particular emphasis on its implications for public health policy and immunization strategies in Mexico. Methods: This position paper was developed through a structured narrative review of the scientific literature. Publications indexed in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase, together with documents issued by the World Health Organization (WHO), Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and European Medicines Agency (EMA), were critically reviewed. Evidence was selected according to its scientific quality and relevance to Mexico and Latin America. Because this work represents an expert consensus rather than a systematic review, formal risk-of-bias assessment was not performed. Results: CHIKV circulates through both urban and sylvatic transmission cycles and continues to expand into regions where competent mosquito vectors are established. Disease progression is driven by complex innate and adaptive immune responses, with exaggerated inflammatory activation contributing to chronic rheumatologic sequelae. Laboratory confirmation relies primarily on molecular assays during the viremic phase and serological testing thereafter. Recent advances in vaccine development—including live-attenuated and virus-like particle (VLP) platforms—have demonstrated favorable immunogenicity and acceptable safety profiles. However, vaccination should be considered as one component of an integrated prevention strategy that also includes vector surveillance, environmental control, and rapid outbreak detection. Conclusions: Chikungunya remains an emerging global public health challenge because of its expanding geographic distribution, epidemic potential, and long-term clinical consequences. Incorporating vaccination into comprehensive arboviral control programs, together with strengthened surveillance and integrated vector management, may substantially reduce disease burden. This position paper provides evidence-based recommendations to support future chikungunya prevention and vaccination policies in Mexico.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Pharmacology and chemical data from DrugBank
Key facts
Drug status
Approved
Major interactions
None known
Half-life
Not available
Mechanism
Intramuscular injection of live chikungunya virus (CHIKV) vaccine elicits CHIKV-specific immune responses.
Food interactions
None known
Human targets
None mapped
Data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Pharmacokinetics at a glance
Absorption
Half-life
Protein binding
Volume of distribution
Metabolism
Elimination
[L48716]
…
Clearance
Pharmacokinetic data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Chikungunya vaccine (live, attenuated) - marketed under the name Ixchiq - was approved by the FDA in November 2023, becoming the first and only vaccine indicated for the prevention of disease caused by chikungunya virus.[L48726] It is approved for use in patients 18 years of age and older who are at high-risk of exposure to chikungunya virus.
[L48716]
Known interactions with other medicines. Always consult a healthcare professional.
Showing 50 of 426 interactions
How the body processes this drug — absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination
[L48716]
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Show
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Linked compound data from DrugBank Open Data (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Chikungunya vaccine (live, attenuated)
Matched from: Chikungunya vaccine
DrugBank citations
If you use DrugBank data in your research, please cite:
- DrugBank 6.02024Recommended citationKnox C., Wilson M., Klinger C.M., et alDrugBank 6.0: the DrugBank Knowledgebase for 2024Nucleic Acids Res. 2024 Jan 552(D1):D1265-D1275
- DrugBank 5.02018Wishart D.S., Feunang Y.D., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Nov 846(D1):D1074-D1082
- DrugBank 4.02014Law V., Knox C., Djoumbou Y., et alDrugBank 4.0: shedding new light on drug metabolismNucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan 142(1):D1091-7
- DrugBank 3.02011Knox C., Law V., Jewison T., et alDrugBank 3.0: a comprehensive resource for 'omics' research on drugsNucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan39(Database issue):D1035-41
- DrugBank 2.02008Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets.Nucleic Acids Research2008 Jan36(Database issue):D901-6
- DrugBank 1.02006Wishart D.S., Knox C., Guo A.C., et alDrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration.Nucleic Acids Research2006 Jan 134(Database issue):D668-72