Cefoxitin 2g powder for solution for injection vials
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Cefoxitin is a semi-synthetic, broad-spectrum cepha antibiotic for intravenous administration.
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Cefoxitin
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
View EudraVigilance report
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Cefoxitin
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
4 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Cefoxitin on the MHRA register
Renoxitin 2g powder for solution for injection vials
WHO defined daily dose (DDD)
6 gram
Not a recommended dose. The DDD is the assumed average maintenance dose per day for a drug used for its main indication in adults. It is a statistical measure used for research and comparison purposes only.
Source: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, distributed via the NHS dm+d supplementary BNF/ATC mapping files (NHSBSA). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing all 27 studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 1 · Randomised trials: 2 · 1983–2026
Showing all 27 studies, sorted by most relevant.
M. D'Angelica, Ryan J. Ellis, Jason B Liu, et al.
JAMA, 2023
- Cefoxitin
- Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
Srivastava S, Gumbo T
2026
- Mycobacterium abscessus
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
- Lung Diseases
ABSTRACT Guideline-based combination therapy achieves sputum culture conversion rates in 23%–34% of patients with Mycobacterium abscessus -complex lung disease. Thus, new therapies are needed. We performed a systematic review to validate and benchmark the hollow fiber system model of M. abscessus lung disease for drug development. We performed a literature search to identify all published hollow fiber system pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses was used for bias minimization. A total of 12 studies were identified. The average quality score was 13.7 out of 21. Eight were monotherapy (exposure-effect and dose-fractionation), one double β-lactam, and three guideline-based therapy studies. For omadacycline and imipenem, hollow fiber system data were accompanied by clinical real-world evidence confirmation. Microbial kill was always terminated by antimicrobial resistance. We used quantitative analyses to rank drugs’ efficacy based on CFU/mL kill below day 0 bacterial burden normalized to multi-drug guideline-based therapy kill. The highest-ranked drugs were sulbactam-durlobactam-ceftriaxone (177-fold), epetraborole (15-fold), and omadacycline (7-fold) better than guideline-based therapy. We used the target exposures identified in the systematic analysis in Monte Carlo experiments to identify optimal doses for inhaled formulations. The optimal inhalational dose of imipenem was 250 mg/day, for tigecycline 4 mg/day, for cefoxitin 50 mg/day, and for amikacin liposome inhalation suspension 590 mg once weekly. The hollow fiber system model of M. abscessus lung disease is tractable for exposure-effect, dose-fractionation, and factorial design combination studies. It could also be used to rank drugs and inform on which drugs to test in novel combinations. IMPORTANCE Current treatments for Mycobacterium abscessus lung disease fail in 70%–80% of patients and are toxic. The hollow fiber system has been used to study old and new potential treatments for this disease. We performed a systematic review of this methodology, for lessons learned. We found 12 studies, which were of adequate quality. Efficacy was always terminated by antimicrobial resistance. The top three drugs in terms of efficacy were sulbactam-durlobactam-ceftriaxone, epetraborole, and omadacycline, which were 7 to 177 times better than standard of care. These drugs could be combined into a new treatment regimen better than current treatments. We also calculated new doses for imipenem, tigecycline, cefoxitin, and amikacin when administered as inhalational therapy. The inhaled doses were multiple-fold lower than intravenous ones, which could be less toxic. The hollow fiber system model is an easily managed system from drug development and dose finding for M. abscessus lung disease.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Lee JL, Kim HJ, Kim KM, et al.
2026
Prof. Dr. H. Knothe, P. D. P. Shah, Dr. V. Krcmery, et al.
Infection, 1983
- Conjugation, Genetic
- R Factors
- Cefamandole
Shannon M. Mitchell, J. Ullman, A. Teel, et al.
The Science of the total environment, 2014
- Ampicillin
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
- Cefoxitin
C. D. DeStefano Shields, S. V. Van Meerbeke, F. Housseau, et al.
The Journal of infectious diseases, 2016
- Bacteroides fragilis
- Cefoxitin
- Cell Transformation, Neoplastic
M. Argudín, S. Roisin, L. Nienhaus, et al.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2018
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
- Bacterial Proteins
- beta-Lactamases
M. Cella, T. Coulson, Samantha MacEachern, et al.
Scientific Reports, 2023
- Staphylococcal Infections
- Probiotics
- Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Therapies which target quorum sensing (QS) systems that regulate virulence in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are a promising alternative to antibiotics. QS systems play a crucial in the regulation of MRSA antibiotic resistance, exotoxin production, antioxidant protection and immune cell evasion, and are therefore attractive therapeutic targets to reduce the virulence of a pathogen. In the present work the the effects of bioactive peptides isolated from two strains of lactic acid bacteria were tested against antibiotic resistance, carotenoid production, resistance to oxidative killing and biofilm structure in two clinical MRSA isolates. The results obtained from fractional-inhibitory concentration assays with bulk and semi-purified bioactive molecules showed a significant synergistic effect increasing cefoxitin mediated killing of MRSA. This was coupled to a six-fold decrease of the major membrane pigment staphyloxanthin, and a 99% increase in susceptibility to oxidative stress mediated killing. Real-time quantitative PCR analysis of the QS-genes agrA and luxS, showed differential expression between MRSA strains, and a significant downregulation of the hemolysin gene hla. Light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy revealed alteration in biofilm formation and clustering behavior. These results demonstrate that bioactive metabolites may be effectively applied in tandem with beta-lactam antibiotics to sensitize MRSA to cefoxitin. Moreover, these results shown that several key QS-controlled virulence mechanisms are diminished by probiotic metabolites.
Abstract licence: CC BY
O. Toma, Patty Suntrup, A. Stefanescu, et al.
Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2011
- Abdomen
- Adipose Tissue
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
Romaine Edirmanasinghe, Romaine Edirmanasinghe, R. Finley, et al.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2017
- Ampicillin
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
- beta-Lactamases
ABSTRACT This study characterized cefoxitin-resistant and -susceptible Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg strains from humans, abattoir poultry, and retail poultry to assess the molecular relationships of isolates from these sources in Québec in 2012. Isolates were collected as part of the Canadian Integrated Program for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (CIPARS). All isolates were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing, PCR for CMY-2, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). A total of 113 S . Heidelberg isolates from humans ( n = 51), abattoir poultry ( n = 18), and retail poultry ( n = 44) were studied. All cefoxitin-resistant isolates ( n = 65) were also resistant to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ampicillin, ceftiofur, and ceftriaxone, and all contained the CMY-2 gene. PFGE analysis showed that 111/113 (98.2%) isolates clustered together with ≥90% similarity. Core genome analysis using WGS identified 13 small clusters of isolates with 0 to 4 single nucleotide variations (SNVs), consisting of cefoxitin-resistant and -susceptible human, abattoir poultry, and retail poultry isolates. CMY-2 plasmids from cefoxitin-resistant isolates all belonged to incompatibility group I1. Analysis of IncI1 plasmid sequences revealed high identity (95 to 99%) to a previously described plasmid (pCVM29188_101) found in Salmonella Kentucky. When compared to pCVM29188_101, all sequenced cefoxitin-resistant isolates were found to carry 1 of 10 possible variant plasmids. Transmission of S . Heidelberg may be occurring between human, abattoir poultry, and retail poultry sources, and transmission of a common CMY-2 plasmid may be occurring among S . Heidelberg strains with variable genetic backgrounds.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Pharmacology and chemical data from DrugBank
Key facts
Drug status
Approved
Major interactions
194 found
Half-life
41 to 59 minutes
Mechanism
The bactericidal action of cefoxitin results from inhibition of cell wall synthesis.
Food interactions
None known
Human targets
None mapped
Data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Pharmacokinetics at a glance
Half-life
41 to 59 minutes
Metabolism
6-hour
Elimination
6-hour
Pharmacokinetic data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Known interactions with other medications. Always consult a healthcare professional.
Showing 50 of 799 interactions
How the body processes this drug — absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination
ATC J01DC01
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Show
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Linked compound data from DrugBank Open Data (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Cefoxitin
Additional database identifiers
Drugs Product Database (DPD)
11254
ChemSpider
389981
BindingDB
50335563
PDB
CFX
ZINC
ZINC000003830449
GenBank Gene Database
X06480
GenBank Protein Database
41218
UniProt Accession
DACC_ECOLI
GenBank Gene Database
X06479
UniProt Accession
DACA_ECOLI
UniProt Accession
PBP7_ECOLI
GenBank Gene Database
X59460
GenBank Protein Database
41216
UniProt Accession
DACB_ECOLI
GenBank Gene Database
X02164
GenBank Protein Database
581194
UniProt Accession
PBPA_ECOLI
GenBank Gene Database
X02163
GenBank Protein Database
42468
UniProt Accession
PBPB_ECOLI
GenBank Gene Database
K00137
UniProt Accession
FTSI_ECOLI
UniProt Accession
Q75Y35_STREE
GenBank Gene Database
AE007317
GenBank Protein Database
15457529
UniProt Accession
Q7CRA4_STRR6
UniProt Accession
PBP2A_STRR6
GenBank Gene Database
M90527
GenBank Protein Database
153767
UniProt Accession
PBPA_STRR6
GenBank Gene Database
X16022
GenBank Protein Database
984233
UniProt Accession
PBP2_STRR6
GenBank Gene Database
V00093
GenBank Protein Database
39575
UniProt Accession
BLAC_BACLI
DrugBank citations
If you use DrugBank data in your research, please cite the following publications:
Show earlier publications
Structured knowledge from the free knowledge base
ATC classifications (Wikidata)
Linked open data from Wikidata (Q2353907), a free and open knowledge base operated by the Wikimedia Foundation. Data is available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication.