Casirivimab 120mg/ml solution for infusion 2.5ml vials

BackgroundClinical evidence suggests that pregnant women are more vulnerable to COVID-19, since they are at increased risk for disease progression and for obstetric complications, such as premature labor, miscarriage, preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, fetal growth restriction and perinatal death. Despite this evidence, pregnant women are often excluded from clinical trials, resulting in limited knowledge on COVID-19 management. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to provide better evidence on the efficacy and safety of available COVID-19 treatment in pregnant women.MethodsFour authors searched major electronic databases from inception until 1 st November-2022 for controlled trials/observational studies, investigating outcomes after the administration of anti-SARS-CoV-2 treatments in pregnant women affected by COVID-19. The analyses investigated the cumulative incidence of delivery and maternal outcomes in pregnant women, comparing those taking active medication vs standard care. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Statistical significance was assessed using the random effects model and inverse-variance method. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the updated 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The protocol has been registered in Prospero (number registration: CRD42023397445).ResultsFrom initially 937 non duplicate records, we assessed the full texts of 40 articles, finally including ten studies. In six studies, including 1627 patients, the use of casirivimab/imdevimab (CAS/IMD), remdesivir, and IFN-alpha 2b significantly decreased the need of cesarean section ((RR = 0.665; 95%CI: 0.491-0.899; p = 0.008; I 2 = 19.5%;) (Table 1, (Fig. 1). Treatments did not decrease the risk of preterm delivery, admission to neonatal ICU, or stillbirth/perinatal loss (p-values > 0.50 for all these outcomes) and did not prevent the progression of disease towards severe degrees (k = 8; 2,374 pregnant women; RR = 0.778; 95%CI: 0.550-1.099; p = 0.15; I 2 = 0%). Moreover, the use of medications during pregnancy did not modify the incidence of maternal death in two studies (Table 2).ConclusionsTo our analysis, CAS/IMD, remdesivir, and IFN alpha 2b reduced the number of cesarean sections but demonstrated no effect on disease progression and other obstetric and COVID-19 related outcomes. The inability to evaluate the influence of viral load on illness development in pregnant women was attributed to lack of data. In our systematic review, no major side effects were reported. Though, it is essential for the medical community to focus more on clinical trials and less on episodic case reports and case series, with standardization of fetal and maternal outcomes.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BackgroundMonoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and antiviral drugs have emerged as additional tools for treatment of COVID-19.AimWe aimed to review data on susceptibility of 14 SARS-CoV-2 variants to mAbs and antiviral drugs authorised in the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA) countries.MethodsWe constructed a literature review compiling 298 publications from four databases: PubMed, Science Direct, LitCovid and BioRxiv/MedRxiv preprint servers. We included publications on nirmatrelvir and ritonavir, remdesivir and tixagevimab and cilgavimab, regdanvimab, casirivimab and imdevimab, and sotrovimab approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) by 1 October 2024.ResultsThe mutations identified in the open reading frame (ORF)1ab, specifically nsp5:H172Y, nsp5:H172Y and Q189E, nsp5:L50F and E166V and nsp5:L50F, E166A and L167V, led to a decrease in susceptibility to nirmatrelvir and ritonavir, ranging from moderate (25-99) to high reductions (> 100). Casirivimab and imdevimab exhibited highly reduced neutralisation capacity across all Omicron sub-lineages. Sub-lineages BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5 had decreased susceptibility to regdanvimab, while sotrovimab showed decreased efficacy for BA.2, BA.4, BQ.1.1 and BA.2.86. Tixagevimab and cilgavimab exhibited highly reduced neutralisation activity against BQ.1, BQ.1.1, XBB, XBB.1.5 and BA.2.86 sub-lineages.ConclusionsThe emergence of new variants, some with altered antigenic characteristics, may lead to resistance against mAbs and/or antiviral drugs and evasion of immunity induced naturally or by vaccination. This summary of mutations, combination of mutations and SARS-CoV-2 variants linked to reduced susceptibility to mAbs and antiviral drugs, should aid the selection of appropriate treatment strategies and/or phasing out therapies that have lost their effectiveness.

Abstract licence: CC BY

ObjectivePregnant patients are at increased risk of severe illness, in-hospital mortality, and preterm birth in the setting of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, they often are excluded from clinical trials that analyze improved therapeutics for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Thus, there are relatively few available data that examine the safety of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in pregnant patients with COVID-19, which we aimed to explore in this systematic review.Data sourcesWe searched PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar on September 30, 2022. Included studies encompassed English-language case reports with at least five participants, cross-sectional studies, case-control studies, cohort studies, retrospective or prospective chart reviews, and randomized controlled trials that enrolled pregnant women who received SARS-CoV-2-targeted mAbs. Studies were screened for eligibility using Covidence according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines and were subsequently evaluated for risk of bias with the JBI critical appraisal checklist.Tabulation integration and resultsInitial search yielded 616 studies; 13 publications were ultimately eligible. Pregnant patients were treated with SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing mAbs casirivimab-imdevimab, bamlanivimab, or bamlanivimab-etesevimab. A total of 365 patients were treated with casirivimab-imdevimab, 13 were treated with bamlanivimab, and 11 were treated with bamlanivimab-etesevimab. There were no cases of maternal mortality. Eighteen of the 389 patients had adverse effects related to mAb administration-all resolved. Of the patients treated with casirivimab-imdevimab, there were 35 preterm deliveries, two fetal deaths, one neonatal death due to sepsis, five cases of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM), one case of PROM, and 24 neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions. Of the patients treated with bamlanivimab, there was one case of preterm PROM and one preterm delivery. There were no NICU admissions in the bamlanivimab or bamlanivimab-etesevimab cohorts.ConclusionPreliminary data suggest that neutralizing mAb treatment for COVID-19 in pregnant patients is safe. However, treatment-associated events support the importance of clinical trials to determine the statistical significance of maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant patients treated with SARS-CoV-2-targeted mAbs.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND