Calcium carbonate 600mg / Magnesium carbonate 125mg chewable tablets
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Calcium carbonate + Magnesium carbonate
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
2 branded products available
Part of the Andrews brand family (generic: Calcium carbonate + Magnesium carbonate)
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Calcium carbonate + Magnesium carbonate on the MHRA register
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(4)
Chronic kidney disease: assessment and management (NG203)
Preventing recurrent hypomagnesaemia: oral magnesium glycerophosphate (ESUOM4)
Raloxifene for the primary prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures in postmenopausal women (TA160)
Raloxifene and teriparatide for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures in postmenopausal women (TA161)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 7 · Randomised trials: 6 · 1963–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Brian H. Rowe, Jennifer A. Bretzlaff, Chris Bourdon, et al.
Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2000
O. A. Jimoh, K. S. Ariffin, Hashim Bin Hussin, et al.
Carbonates and Evaporites, 2018
Marampa WR, Febrida R, Djustiana N
2026
Zhaoyong Zou, W. Habraken, G. Matveeva, et al.
Science, 2019
C. Blue, Anthony J. Giuffre, S. Mergelsberg, et al.
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2017
Boers JRM, Garcia M, Sanchez E, et al.
2026
- Calcium Carbonate
- Oxytocin
- Oxytocics
Yahyavi SK, Jorsal MJ, Wriedt EB, et al.
2026
ObjectiveWhile the effect of the RANKL-inhibitor denosumab on serum minerals is well-documented, its impact on seminal fluid minerals is poorly understood. This study examines the correlation between the high levels of soluble-RANKL, osteoprotegerin (OPG), and minerals in seminal fluid and whether this can be influenced by denosumab.MethodsTwo cohorts comprised this study: 100 young men from the general Danish population with no reported fertility issues, and 91 infertile men who were treated with a single dose of denosumab (60 mg), or placebo in a randomized controlled trial assessing the effect on semen quality. Each man underwent a physical examination and semen analysis, including analysis of soluble RANKL, OPG, calcium, magnesium, and phosphate in the seminal fluid.ResultsIn both men from the general population and infertile men, seminal OPG concentrations were positively correlated with seminal calcium (rnormal=0.54 and rinfertile=0.81), seminal magnesium (rnormal=0.58 and rinfertile=0.75), and a weak negative correlation was seen with seminal phosphate (rnormal=-0.17 and rinfertile=-0.34) concentrations. Seminal soluble RANKL was not associated with seminal minerals. Following 60 mg denosumab treatment, no changes were observed after 160 days in seminal calcium (p = 0.42), magnesium (p = 0.55), or phosphate concentrations (p = 0.63). Changes in seminal OPG were moderately negatively correlated with changes in serum AMH (r=-0.32), LH (r=-0.30), and FSH (r=-0.31).ConclusionA strong correlation between OPG and minerals in seminal fluids from both normal and infertile men suggests that the release of these factors by the prostate or seminal vesicle is regulated by the same factors, but cannot be modified by a short-term systemic RANKL inhibition with denosumab.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03030196. Registered January 24, 2017.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Ma J, Liu B, Pang J, et al.
2026
- Kidney Failure, Chronic
- Ferric Compounds
- Renal Dialysis
BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ferric citrate tablets in Chinese patients with hyperphosphatemia undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD).MethodsIn this phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial, patients with hyperphosphatemia on maintenance hemodialysis were randomly assigned to receive either ferric citrate or sevelamer carbonate tablets for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in serum phosphorus levels from baseline to week 12, with a non-inferiority margin of 0.32 mmol/L. Secondary endpoints included changes in serum calcium, intact parathyroid hormone, and safety assessments.ResultsA total of 239 patients were randomized to the ferric citrate group (n = 119) or the sevelamer carbonate group (n = 120). The mean change in serum phosphorus levels was -0.70 ± 0.50 mmol/L in the ferric citrate group and -0.61 ± 0.59 mmol/L in the sevelamer carbonate group (least squares mean difference, -0.09 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.24 to 0.05 mmol/L; non-inferiority margin, 0.32 mmol/L). No significant inter-group differences were found in the percentage of patients achieving target phosphorus levels (49.09% vs. 48.28%, p = 0.902). Ferric citrate significantly improved iron-related parameters and hemoglobin levels. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild, with gastrointestinal disorders being the most common.ConclusionsFerric citrate tablets were non-inferior to sevelamer carbonate in reducing serum phosphorus levels in hyperphosphatemia patients on maintenance hemodialysis, with the added benefit of improving iron-related anemia and a favorable safety profile.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Yoneda H, Tomita T, Shinzaki S
2026
T. Tarutani, R. Clayton, T. Mayeda
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1969
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.