Calcipotriol 50micrograms/g / Betamethasone dipropionate 500micrograms/g foam
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Calcipotriol + Betamethasone
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
5 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Calcipotriol + Betamethasone on the MHRA register
Enstilar 50micrograms/g / 0.5 mg/g cutaneous foam
Enstilar 50micrograms/g / 0.5 mg/g cutaneous foam
Enstilar 50micrograms/g / 0.5 mg/g cutaneous foam
Enstilar 50micrograms/g / 0.5 mg/g cutaneous foam
This is the NHS Drug Tariff indicative price used for reimbursement purposes. It may not reflect the price paid by patients or pharmacies.
View full Drug TariffSource: NHS Drug Tariff via NHSBSA. Derived from dm+d VMPP (Virtual Medicinal Product Pack) pricing data. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(1)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 14 · Randomised trials: 21 · 1998–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Maverakis Ramirez N, Jaeger ZJ, Lee DJ
2026
Vitiligo is a depigmentation disorder whose treatment remains a serious challenge. While it is generally accepted that topicals and phototherapy are helpful for generalized symmetric disease, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide the best evidence for treatment. Our objective was to identify and summarize RCTs for vitiligo from 2013 to 2023. A systematic review registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) was performed per PRISMA guidelines. We searched CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science for RCTs using keywords such as 'vitiligo' and/or 'treatment' or 'intervention.' A total of 652 studies underwent full-text review, and 151 studies met the inclusion criteria. We focused our study on RCTs using the vitiligo area scoring index (VASI) as the primary outcome measure, leading to 36 studies. We further narrowed our focus to studies that could be aggregated into the intervention categories: phototherapy and systemic combination therapy (n=10), topical and topical combination therapy (n=15), and systemic monotherapy (n=5). Treated versus control subjects showed statistically improved VASI after the following interventions were added to phototherapy: oral psoralen, oral minipulsed prednisone, implanted afamelanotide, topical ethyl vanillate, topical bimatoprost, and oral vitamins A and E. Effective topical therapies were ruxolitinib, calcipotriol and betamethasone, tacrolimus and mometasone, and microdermabrasion and tacrolimus. None of the systemic monotherapies was superior to their corresponding comparator.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Yi Zhao, Akihiko Asahina, Pravit Asawanonda, et al.
The Journal of Dermatology, 2021
Abdel-Aziz W, Elnaiem W, Hassan MA, et al.
2022
Psoriasis vulgaris has serious co-morbidities and impairs the quality of life. Vitamin D analogues and corticosteroids are widely used for treating psoriasis, but they have numerous effects. This review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate (Cal/BD) as an alternative that may enhance patients' adherence. We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Web of science, and Scopus for reliable trials. The analysis was conducted by comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA) software using the Inverse-Variance method. The analysis showed that the fixed Cal/BD combination improves the psoriasis area and severity index score in body lesions (P<0.0001 at weeks one, two, four, and eight). It improves the total sign score (TSS) and achieves TSS-based response in scalp lesions (P<0.01 at eight weeks). Treatment success was achieved according to physician’s global assessment/investigator’s global assessment in scalp lesions (P<0.001 at weeks four, and eight), and according to patient’s global assessment in body (P=0.001 at week four) and scalp lesions (P<0.05 at weekss two, four, and eight). Adverse events were low for body (P<0.05 at weeks four, eight, and twelve) and scalp lesions (P<0.0001 at week eight). Our conclusion is that Cal/BD is effective and well-tolerated alternative therapy for psoriasis vulgaris.
Abstract licence: CC BY
A. Pinter, A. Reich, P. Arenberger, et al.
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 2023
Ju HJ, Kim JY, Jeong DH, et al.
2025
BackgroundDespite advances in systemic targeted therapies, topical agents remain the primary treatment for localized psoriasis. However, their therapeutic effects are often delayed and unsatisfactory. The dissolving microneedle (DMN) patch, a novel transdermal drug delivery system, enhances the absorption of topical agents through micro-channels.ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of DMN patches in enhancing drug delivery and improving clinical outcomes in psoriatic plaques.MethodsA prospective, randomized, split-body study was conducted to verify the efficacy of additional use of DMN patches after topical agent application in psoriasis treatment. Patients with mild psoriasis were enrolled and 6 paired lesions per patient were randomized into 3 groups: ointment-only, ointment-with-no needle patch, and ointment-with-DMN patch. Lesions were treated with a topical agent (betamethasone and calcipotriol) once daily for 2 weeks. Modified psoriasis area and severity index (mPASI) scores were measured weekly. In vitro and ex vivo experiments were performed to confirm micro-channel formation, microneedle dissolution, and drug penetration enhancement.ResultsA total of 132 paired lesions from 22 patients were analyzed. The ointment-with-DMN patch group showed significantly improved mPASI scores (80.4%±20.5%; 5.42→1.06) compared to the ointment-with-no needle patch (64.6%±33.0%; 4.94→1.68) (ppIn vitro studies demonstrated 2.1-fold enhanced drug delivery with DMN patches, while ex vivo histological analysis confirmed micro-channel formation. No adverse events, including infection or psoriasis exacerbation, were observed.ConclusionThe DMN patch is an effective adjunctive tool that enhances transdermal drug delivery and improves therapeutic outcomes in psoriatic plaques, particularly those refractory to topical agents.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02955576.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
S. Gerdes, A. Campanati, G. Ratzinger, et al.
Dermatology and Therapy, 2024
Amgen Almirall-Hermal, Biontec Bms Boehringer-Ingelheim Celgene Celltrion Gsk Biogen Idec, Eli Lilly, et al.
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 2023
Lin Cai, Furen Zhang, Guoqiang Zhang, et al.
Chinese medical journal, 2026
Cai L, Zhang F, Zhang G, et al.
2026
Rahimnia A, Ehsani A, Esmaeili N, et al.
2025
Introduction: Nail psoriasis poses a notable challenge due to its significant impact on patient's quality of life and its resistance to traditional treatments. Recent interest has focused on laser therapies, which offer targeted treatment by addressing the underlying inflammatory processes of the disease. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of pulsed dye laser (PDL), fractional CO2 laser, and Nd:YAG (neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet) laser for nail psoriasis. Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 40 patients with mild to moderate bilateral nail psoriasis were enrolled at Razi hospital. The participants were divided into four groups: Nd:YAG laser, PDL, fractional CO2 laser, and a control group treated with calcipotriol/betamethasone ointment. Each received four treatment sessions over four months. The Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) was used to evaluate effectiveness, while pain and satisfaction were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS). Statistical significance was determined, with PResults: The study found that PDL achieved the highest reduction in NAPSI scores, with a significant 62.4% decrease, followed by a 54.6% decrease with the fractional CO2 laser. In contrast, the Nd:YAG laser achieved a less notable 32.4% improvement, while the ointment control group showed a 15.9% decrease. Pain was least reported in the PDL group, and satisfaction scores were highest among these patients. The PDL and fractional CO2 lasers outperformed both the Nd:YAG laser and the topical therapy in effectiveness and patient comfort. Conclusion: PDL and fractional CO2 laser treatments are superior interventions for managing nail psoriasis, providing a significant improvement in NAPSI scores and better patient experiences compared to the Nd:YAG laser and topical ointment. These findings endorse the inclusion of laser therapy in management plans for nail psoriasis, suggesting further research into optimizing their use and potential combination with other therapies. Trial Registration: https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/; identifier: IRCT20220723055530N4.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.