Calcarea carbonica 6c homeopathic tablets
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
2 branded products available
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary.
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing all 25 studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 1 · Randomised trials: 4 · 2023–2026
Showing all 25 studies, sorted by most relevant.
Balamurugan D, Nayak C, Chattopadhyay A, et al.
2023
- Homeopathy
- Psoriasis
- India
Akram J, Basu A, Hossain MS, et al.
2025
- Homeopathy
- Materia Medica
- Quality of Life
Gupta B, Misra P, Karuppusamy A, et al.
2023
- Epilepsy
- Homeopathy
- Materia Medica
Koushik Bhar
Journal of Applied Sciences and Clinical Practice, 2024
Abstract Background: Hyperuricemia (HU) remains a priority research area in every medical science, including complementary and alternative medicine interventions and homeopathy; however, the research evidence is limited. In homeopathy, Thlaspi bursa pastoris (TBP) is considered to be a potential treatment option in HU. Methods: An open-label, randomized, equivalence trial was conducted comparing TBP with individualized homeopathic medicines (IHMs). Serum uric acid (SUA) was the primary outcome; Gout Assessment Questionnaire version 2.0 (GAQ-2) and Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile version 2.0 (MYMOP-2) were the secondary outcomes; all measured at baseline and after 6 and 12 weeks. Intention-to-treat analysis was carried out to detect noninferiority and group differences using unpaired t -tests and two-way repeated-measure analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: There were no differences between the groups at baseline. Reduction in SUA after 6 and 12 weeks was similar between groups ( P = 0.784). Group differences in the secondary outcomes were also nonsignificant (all P > 0.05). TBP revealed noninferiority against IHMs, both after 6 weeks and 12 weeks in SUA and MYMOP-2 profile scores, but not in GAQ2 scores. Sulfur and Calcarea carbonica were the most frequently prescribed medicines in the IHMs group. There were no harms or serious adverse events reported from either of the groups. Conclusion: TBP acted noninferior to IHM in HU and both appeared to be equally effective. Rigorous and larger trials are warranted. Trial Registration: This trial was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry – India (CTRI/2018/10/016174; UTN: U1111-1221-8000).
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-SA
Bertoni C, Alberti I, Parri N, et al.
2025
- Homeopathy
- Phytotherapy
- Apitherapy
Background: Acute infections in children are prevalent and often lead to antibiotic overuse due to the lack of evidence-based alternative approaches. Phytotherapeutic, homeopathic treatments and bee products are frequently sought as alternative or adjunctive therapies. This scoping review aims to map the existing evidence on the efficacy and safety of these interventions in managing acute pediatric infections. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases to identify studies assessing the use of phytotherapeutic, homeopathic remedies and bee products in children with acute infections. Gastrointestinal infections were not considered since the use of non-antibiotic treatments (probiotics) in these conditions has been widely addressed. Effectiveness: Phytotherapeutic agents and bee products demonstrated promising results in reducing symptom severity and duration in respiratory infections, whereas homeopathic data were limited and inconsistent. Regarding safety, both interventions were generally well-tolerated, with few adverse events reported. No studies or very limited evidence were available for other acute infections such as urinary, dermatological, osteoarticular and nervous system infections. Conclusions: Phytotherapeutic interventions and bee products, particularly in acute upper respiratory tract and acute bronchitis, show encouraging signals of efficacy and safety in pediatric populations. However, evidence for their use in other frequent childhood infections, such as otitis media, or gastrointestinal infections, is almost entirely lacking. In addition, the available literature on homeopathic remedies is scarce and methodologically inconsistent, preventing any firm conclusions. Well-designed, large-scale clinical trials focusing on these underexplored conditions are needed to clarify the potential role of phytotherapeutics and homeopathy in pediatric infectious diseases.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Dixit AK, Javed D, Srivastava A, et al.
2024
- Homeopathy
- Materia Medica
- Quality of Life
Vithoulkas G, Chabanov D
2023
- Homeopathy
- History, 19th Century
Abstract For most health professionals who have chosen the challenging path of comprehending classical homeopathy, the theory of miasms is the most intriguing part of our science and is an area where much misunderstanding, criticism and controversy prevails. There are now a large number of opposing ideas and opinions on the subject of miasms, with various classifications, many of which we believe to be erroneous and which confuse many homeopaths and result in incorrect prescriptions. Here we clarify the main postulates of Hahnemann's miasm theory and analyse how his followers transformed his ideas over the next century in the light of medical discoveries. This allows us to understand the limited relevance of miasm theory to modern day prescribing and offer a new and precise definition of the term miasm in relation to modern diseases such as cancer and autoimmune diseases. How we apply this theory to the health challenges of the 21st century, such as increasing environmental pollution and other toxins, may play an important role in the future wellbeing of the human population.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Soto-Sánchez J, Garza-Treviño G
2024
Insomnia is a widespread disease that tends to be associated with other problems, like anxiety. The most frequent anxiety disorder is generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), which is characterized by excessive worrying about everyday situations. Medications for insomnia and anxiety can have adverse reactions and the latter may be ineffective in up to 30% of patients. Here we present a case report of a 27-year-old male patient who suffered from persistent insomnia with comorbid GAD and schizophreniform disorder. Initially, he was taking alprazolam, paroxetine, and risperidone, which had a less-than-satisfactory effect. He was treated with individualized homeopathy, which produced a remarkable improvement within four months. This was evidenced by a decrease in difficulty falling asleep and daytime sleepiness; in addition, anxiety and its accompanying symptoms, such as irritability and diaphoresis, were reduced. This improvement persists for up to one year after the commencement of treatment and despite discontinuation of all medications. This clinical report provides preliminary evidence that persistent insomnia and comorbid GAD can be treated successfully with individualized homeopathy. However, further randomized controlled studies are needed to evaluate its efficacy, effectiveness, and safety more conclusively.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Dr. Nagar Neha, D. K., Dr.K. Ajay, et al.
International Journal of Homoeopathic Sciences, 2023
Prathiba.R, Kumar.P.K
Tuijin Jishu/Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2023
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.