Brinzolamide 10mg/ml / Timolol 5mg/ml eye drops

PurposeThis systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare BT and DT in terms of intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction, safety, and patient preferences.MethodsFollowing PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines, we searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and Embase up to December 30, 2024. Twelve studies (11 randomized controlled trials [RCTs]) involving 1,885 patients were included. Primary outcomes were IOP reduction and adverse events. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.4.1, with mean differences (MD) and risk ratios (RR) calculated for continuous and binary outcomes.ResultsBT demonstrated a statistically greater reduction in the morning IOP compared to DT at 12 weeks or more (BT: MD = 0.56 mmHg, P P P P < 0.001). Patient preference studies favored brinzolamide/timolol fixed combination (BTFC) due to reduced ocular discomfort.ConclusionBT showed a statistically greater reduction in morning IOP than DT; however, the absolute difference was modest, and its clinical relevance is uncertain. BT was associated with less ocular irritation but higher blurred vision risk. High heterogeneity for evening IOP and overall adverse events limits interpretation. Considering these findings, the choice of treatment usually depends on the patient's tolerance to higher initial ocular irritation in DT or blurring of vision in BT. Longer-term trials with 24-h IOP and preference are needed to assess these outcomes meaningfully.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC 4.0

IntroductionIntravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents are a primary management option for retinal diseases. Acute elevation of intraocular pressure (IOP) is a complication associated with these injections that should be considered. This study investigated and compared the prophylactic effects of fixed combination anti-glaucoma medication on IOP spikes following intravitreal anti-VEGF injections.MethodsThis randomized double-blind clinical trial included one eye of each participant indicated for treatment with intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents (bevacizumab, aflibercept, and ranibizumab) and randomly allocated to one of the three prophylactic anti-glaucoma medications, with each drug further divided into one- and two-drop regimens before intravitreal injection. Participants with allergies or contraindications to medications were excluded from the pretreatment groups and were invited to participate in the control group.ResultsThe study involved 308 participants: 89 in the dorzolamide/timolol group, 86 in the brimonidine/timolol group, 101 in the brinzolamide/brimonidine group, and 32 in the control group. Baseline characteristics and IOP were comparable across all groups. In the prophylactic premedication groups, mean IOP at 30 min were within 21 mmHg and returned to their baseline at 1 h. Mean IOP measurements between baseline and 30 min in the brimonidine/timolol two-drop regimen were not significantly different: 13.72 ± 4.63 vs 15.11 ± 4.39 mmHg, p = 0.096. In the control group, IOP significantly increased from baseline at 30 min and 1 h post-injection: 14.31 ± 4.10, 22.15 ± 8.64, and 18.36 ± 7.52 mmHg, respectively, p ConclusionTopical fixed combination anti-glaucoma medication used as a prophylactic treatment before intravitreal anti-VEGF injections significantly prevented IOP spikes post-injection, with a comparable effect among three medications. Prophylactic treatment of IOP spikes should be considered as standard care to prevent further damage in patients with compromised retinal vascular and optic nerve perfusion.Trial registrationTCTR20241005001, retrospectively registered.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to examine the safety and intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of a fixed combination of brinzolamide 1% + brimonidine 0.2% (BBFC) after six months of treatment in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: This was a randomized, multicenter, double-masked, three-month, three-arm contribution-of-elements study with a three-month safety extension. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to treatment with BBFC, brinzolamide 1%, or brimonidine 0.2% after a washout period. Patients dosed their study medications three times daily at 8 am, 3 pm, and 10 pm for six months. Patients returned for visits at two weeks, six weeks, three months, and six months. IOP measurements were used to assess efficacy. Safety assessments were adverse events, corrected distance visual acuity, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, pachymetry, perimetry, fundus parameters, and cardiac parameters. RESULTS: A total of 690 patients were randomized. Six-month mean IOP values were similar to those at three months, when the mean IOP in patients treated with BBFC was significantly lower than that of either monotherapy group. A total of 175 patients experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event (BBFC, 33.0%; brinzolamide, 18.8%; brimonidine, 24.7%), eight of which were severe, and five resulted in discontinuation. Seventy-seven patients discontinued participation due to treatment-related adverse events (BBFC, 17.2%; brinzolamide, 2.1%; brimonidine, 14.5%). There were 21 serious adverse events (n = 7 in each group), none of which was related to treatment. Resting mean pulse and blood pressure with BBFC were similar to those with brimonidine, demonstrating modest, clinically insignificant decreases. No new or increased risks were identified with use of BBFC relative to either monotherapy. CONCLUSION: This study showed that, after six months of treatment, the safety profile of BBFC was similar to that of its individual components and its IOP-lowering activity was similar to its efficacy at three months, when it was superior to both brinzolamide 1% alone and brimonidine 0.2% alone.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC 3.0