Brimonidine 3mg/g gel

This multicenter (four institutions), randomized, investigator-masked, parallel-group clinical trial evaluated and compared the efficacy and safety of preservative-free and preserved brimonidine tartrate 0.15% in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Sixty eyes of 60 patients with intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥ 15 mmHg diagnosed with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension were randomized to preserved (n = 31) and preservative-free (n = 29) brimonidine groups. The enrolled eyes received brimonidine monotherapy three times daily. Main outcome measures were corneal/conjunctival staining score, ocular surface disease index, patient satisfaction score, drug tolerance, and drug adherence rate 12 weeks post first administration. Secondary outcome measurements included visual acuity, IOP, drug tolerance, tear-film break-up time, hemodynamic changes including blood pressure and heart rates, and ocular adverse events. After 12 weeks, both preserved and preservative-free groups showed similar IOP reduction, corneal and conjunctival staining scores, drug tolerance, and adherence rates. The preservative-free group showed significantly better tear-film break-up time and higher patient satisfaction regarding drug use and management. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure reductions during the 12 weeks were significantly lower in the preserved group than in the preservative-free group. Preservative-free brimonidine tartrate showed comparable efficacy and safety, better corneal tear film stability, and patient satisfaction than preserved brimonidine.

Abstract licence: CC BY

of 5.024 and 7.90 folds increase in the mean residence time (MRT). Lack of ocular irritation of the formula was assured by Draize test.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Brimonidine tartrate (BRT) is a highly selective α2 adrenergic receptor agonist as treatment for patients with open angle glaucoma and high intraocular pressure. The objective of this study was to formulate an ophthalmic ion-sensitive in situ gel (ISG) of BRT to increase the retention time of the drug and its bioavailability. The optimum formulation of 2 mg/mL BRT-ISG was obtained with 0.45% gellan gum as the gel matrix. In vitro release results showed that the water-soluble drug bromonidine tartrate in ocular in situ gels exhibited a high burst effect and fast release in solution. The results of dialysis membrane permeation showed that there was a significant difference between the commercially available and BRT-ISG groups after 45 min. The results of the pre-corneal retention study indicated that gellan gum can effectively prolong ocular surface retention. Preliminary stability results showed that it should be stored in a cool and dark place, and the formulation under long-term preservation can be basically stable. The pharmacokinetic study of the BRT-ISG in the anterior chamber of the rabbit eye was studied by microdialysis technique, and microdialysis samples were analyzed by LC-MS/MS. The pharmacokinetic study showed that the BRT-ISG reached Cmax (8.16 mg/L) at 93 min after administration, which was 2.7 times that of the BRT eye drops, and the AUC(0-t) (1397.08 mg·min/L) was 3.4 times that of the BRT eye drops. The optimal prescription can prolong the retention time of BRT in front of the cornea and significantly improve the bioavailability of BRT in the eye. Combined with the results of in vitro release, permeation and pre-corneal retention studies, the improvement of BRT-ISG bioavailability in rabbit eyes was found to be mainly due to the retention effect after the mixture of ISG and tears.

Abstract licence: CC BY

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of repeat injections of Brimonidine Drug Delivery System (Brimo DDS) Generation 2 (Gen 2) containing 400-μg brimonidine in patients with geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). A phase IIb, randomized, multicenter, double-masked, sham-controlled, 30-month study (BEACON). Patients diagnosed with GA secondary to AMD and multifocal lesions with total area of > 1.25 mm2 and ≤ 18 mm2 in the study eye. Enrolled patients were randomized to treatment with intravitreal injections of 400-μg Brimo DDS (n = 154) or sham procedure (n = 156) in the study eye every 3 months from day 1 to month 21. The primary efficacy endpoint was GA lesion area change from baseline in the study eye, assessed with fundus autofluorescence imaging, at month 24. The study was terminated early, at the time of the planned interim analysis, because of a slow GA progression rate (∼ 1.6 mm2/year) in the enrolled population. Least squares mean (standard error) GA area change from baseline at month 24 (primary endpoint) was 3.24 (0.13) mm2 with Brimo DDS (n = 84) versus 3.48 (0.13) mm2 with sham (n = 91), a reduction of 0.25 mm2 (7%) with Brimo DDS compared with sham (P = 0.150). At month 30, GA area change from baseline was 4.09 (0.15) mm2 with Brimo DDS (n = 49) versus 4.52 (0.15) mm2 with sham (n = 46), a reduction of 0.43 mm2 (10%) with Brimo DDS compared with sham (P = 0.033). Exploratory analysis showed numerically smaller loss over time in retinal sensitivity assessed with scotopic microperimetry with Brimo DDS than with sham (P = 0.053 at month 24). Treatment-related adverse events were usually related to the injection procedure. No implant accumulation was observed. Multiple intravitreal administrations of Brimo DDS (Gen 2) were well tolerated. The primary efficacy endpoint at 24 months was not met, but there was a numeric trend for reduction in GA progression at 24 months compared with sham treatment. The study was terminated early because of the lower-than-expected GA progression rate in the sham/control group. Proprietary or commercial disclosures may be found after the references.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

INTRODUCTION: method for evaluating the irritant potential and eye toxicity of substances. A colloidal dispersion of a surfactant and a cosurfactant with a nanosize range is called a nanoemulsion (NE), which is formed by mixing immiscible liquids and stabilized by surfactants. Patients with glaucoma are commonly prescribed Brimonidine (BR), an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist, to lower their intraocular pressure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, surfactant-cosurfactant blends were prepared by mixing Tween 80 (surfactant) and propylene glycol (cosurfactant) in a 4:1(v/v) ratio. Triacetin served as the oil phase, while deionized water was used as the aqueous phase. Using the drop method, a range of NE formulations (F1, F2, F3, FB1, FB2, and FB3) were developed and subsequently evaluated for their potential to irritate, and then the results were compared to those of a commercially available BR eye drop formulation. RESULTS: According to the average cumulative HET-CAM test scores (IS), from excipients, propylene glycol caused moderate irritation by causing slight damage to blood vessels. The formulations FB1 and F1 were found to have the highest level of irritation among other formulations in the investigation, recording 1.05 ±0.07 and 1.2 ±0.10, respectively. All other NE formulations exhibited non-irritating potential, as confirmed by the HET-CAM test, and were comparable to the marketed BR eye drop formulation. CONCLUSION: The NE formulations created for BR were determined to be safe and non-irritating. The findings indicate that the prepared NE could be a beneficial solution for addressing problems with conventional eye drops and delivering BR effectively to the eyes.

Abstract licence: CC BY

antimicrobial assessments revealed good activities for all scaffolds against most of the investigated human pathogens, particularly the one prepared with 9% BT which showed superiority in the antimicrobial effect over other scaffolds. To conclude, our findings proved the capability of nanofibers in loading BT and improving its repurposed antimicrobial efficacy. Therefore, it could be a promising carrier for BT to be used in combating numerous human pathogens.

Abstract licence: CC BY

INTRODUCTION: -adrenoceptor agonist, and has demonstrated ability to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) and have various effects on conjunctival hyperemia and corneal endothelial cell morphology. This study evaluates the pharmacologic effects of RBFC treatment versus its separate components-ripasudil or brimonidine. METHODS: This single-center, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint study with 3 × 3 crossover design randomly assigned healthy adult men to three groups (1:1:1) to undergo consecutive 8-day administration phases (with drug-free intervals of at least 5 days). Subjects received twice-daily instillation of RBFC → ripasudil → brimonidine (group A), ripasudil → brimonidine → RBFC (group B), or brimonidine → RBFC → ripasudil (group C). Endpoints included change in IOP, severity of conjunctival hyperemia, corneal endothelial cell morphology, pupil diameter, and pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Eighteen subjects were assigned in total (six to each group). RBFC significantly reduced IOP from baseline at 1 h post-instillation on days 1 and 8 (12.7 vs. 9.1 and 9.0 mmHg, respectively; both P < 0.001), and provided significantly greater IOP reductions than ripasudil or brimonidine at several time points. The most common adverse drug reaction with all three treatments was mild conjunctival hyperemia, which transiently increased in severity with RBFC or ripasudil, peaking at 15 min post-instillation. In post hoc analyses, conjunctival hyperemia scores were lower with RBFC than with ripasudil at several time points. Transient morphologic changes in corneal endothelial cells occurred for up to several hours with RBFC or ripasudil, but not with brimonidine. Pupil diameter did not change with RBFC. CONCLUSION: RBFC significantly reduced IOP compared with each agent alone. A combination of each agent's pharmacologic profile was observed in that of RBFC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials; Registration No. jRCT2080225220.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC