Bosentan 125mg tablets

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a major risk for pulmonary hypertension with poor prognosis. Limited data is available on the optimal treatment of choice. We aimed to comprehensively assess the efficacy and safety of CTEPH targeted therapies and update the evidence. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane library up to December 2023 to include randomized controlled trials comparing different therapies in patients with CTEPH. Primary outcomes were 6-minute walk distance (6 MWD), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), and mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP). While secondary outcomes were the mean right atrial pressure (mRAP), Borg dyspnea score, cardiac output (CO), cardiac index, adverse events, and all-cause mortality. Fourteen RCTs comprising 1047 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. Regarding 6 MWD, PADN (MD=113.59, 95% CI: 53.80; 173.39), BPA (MD=48.84, 95% CI: 27.99; 69.69), riociguat (MD=42.59, 95% CI: 22.01; 63.18), treprostinil (MD=41.60, 95% CI: 17.07; 66.13), and macitentan (MD=34.00, 95% CI: 3.50; 64.50) were favored compared to placebo. In terms of PVR, BPA (MD=-392.19, 95% CI: -571.77; -212.62), treprostinil (MD=-287.20, 95% CI: -475.63; -98.77), PADN (MD=-280.61, 95% CI: -506.69; -54.52), bosentan (MD=-176.00, 95% CI: -340.91; -11.09), and riociguat (MD=-171.61, 95% CI: -298.40; -44.81) displayed statistically significant results. Current therapeutic modalities are effective in terms of improving exercise capacity, pulmonary hemodynamics, and reducing adverse events and all-cause mortality. Overall, BPA and PADN were superior to all other targeted medications in the studied outcomes. • The optimal treatment modality for CTEPH is still controversial, with conflicting data in the literature. • Our meta-analysis of 14 RCTs showed that BPA and PADN were superior to all other treatment modalities to reduce the odds of mortality. • SUCRA values and treatment ranking list confirm the current findings. • This study can be a guide of recommending BPA and PADN as the approaches of choice in treating CTEPH. • These findings should be validated with large-volume RCTs with long-term outcomes.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

BACKGROUND: Oral bosentan has been widely applied in pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart disease (PAH-CHD). A systemic review and meta-analysis was conducted for a therapeutic evaluation of oral bosentan in both adult and pediatric patients with PAH-CHD. The acute responses and a long-term effect were respectively assessed in a comparison with baseline characteristics, and the improvement of exercise tolerance was analyzed. METHODS: PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of clinical controlled trails or observational studies have been searched for a recording of bosentan effects on the PAH-CHD participants. For mortality and rate of adverse events (AEs), it was described in detail. Randomized-effects model or fixed-effects model was used to calculate different effective values with a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were pooled in this review, and 3 studies enrolled the pediatric patients. Among all studies, 456 patients were diagnosed with PAH-CHD, and 91.7% were treated with oral bosentan. With a term less than 6 months of bosentan therapy, there existed a significant improvement in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) and the World Health Organization functional class (WHO-FC), but no such differences in Borg dyspnea index scores (BDIs) and the resting oxygen saturation (SpO2). Although with a prolonged treatment, not only 6MWD and FC, but also the resting SpO2 and heart rate were changed for a better exercise capability. Additionally, compared with the basic cardiopulmonary hemodynamics, it showed a statistically significant difference in mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance index (PVRi). Although a limitation of pooled studies with comparative outcomes of different terms, outcomes presented a lower WHO-FC which contributes to a success in a prolonged treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Bosentan in PAH-CHD is well established and still requires clinical trials for an identification of its efficiency on CHD patients for an optimized period lessening a serious complication and the common AEs.

Abstract licence: CC BY-ND

Acute respiratory distress syndrome is characterized by dyspnea at presentation, tachypnea on physical examination, findings of bilateral infiltration in chest radiography, refractory hypoxia, and high mortality. Although the main treatment approach is to address the underlying disease, there are also pharmacological and nonpharmacological options for supportive treatment. There is currently no pharmacological agent with proven efficacy in this syndrome, and many drugs are being studied for this purpose. One of these is the endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan. Cite this article as: Araz O. Current Pharmacological Approach to ARDS: The Place of Bosentan. Eurasian J Med 2020; 52(1): 81-85.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) is a complex disease associated with progressive deterioration. Targeted therapy for IPAH has improved in the last several decades. However, there remain many challenges to current treatment of children with IPAH, including poor prognosis and a median survival of 0.8 years. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) appears to be a key mediator in the pathogenesis of IPAH, with elevated concentrations in the plasma. Bosentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist, has been confirmed in Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to effectively treat IPAH when administered in recent studies. This review focuses on related studies and advance of bosentan in the treatment of IPAH in children.

Abstract licence: CC BY