Biperiden 2mg tablets
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
A muscarinic antagonist that has effects in both the central and peripheral nervous systems.
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Biperiden
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
View EudraVigilance report
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Biperiden
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
3 branded products available
WHO defined daily dose (DDD)
10 mg
Not a recommended dose. The DDD is the assumed average maintenance dose per day for a drug used for its main indication in adults. It is a statistical measure used for research and comparison purposes only.
Source: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, distributed via the NHS dm+d supplementary BNF/ATC mapping files (NHSBSA). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 2 · Randomised trials: 9 · 1978–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Gerolymos C, Barazer R, Yon DK, et al.
2024
- Akathisia, Drug-Induced
- Antipsychotic Agents
- Propranolol
ImportanceAntipsychotic-induced akathisia (AIA) occurs in 14% to 35% of patients treated with antipsychotics and is associated with increased suicide and decreased adherence in patients with schizophrenia. However, no comprehensive review and network meta-analysis has been conducted to compare the efficacy of treatments for AIA.ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy associated with AIA treatments.Data sourcesThree databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) were systematically searched by multiple researchers for double-blind randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing active drugs for the treatment of AIA with placebo or another treatment between May 30 and June 18, 2023.Study selectionSelected studies were RCTs that compared adjunctive drugs for AIA vs placebo or adjunctive treatment in patients treated with antipsychotics fulfilling the criteria for akathisia, RCTs with sample size of 10 patients or more, only trials in which no additional drugs were administered during the study, and RCTs that used a validated akathisia score. Trials with missing data for the main outcome (akathisia score at the end points) were excluded.Data extraction and synthesisData extraction and synthesis were performed, estimating standardized mean differences (SMDs) through pairwise and network meta-analysis with a random-effects model. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was followed.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was the severity of akathisia measured by a validated scale at the last available end point.ResultsFifteen trials involving 492 participants compared 10 treatments with placebo. Mirtazapine (15 mg/d for ≥5 days; SMD, -1.20; 95% CI, -1.83 to -0.58), biperiden (6 mg/d for ≥14 days; SMD, -1.01; 95% CI, -1.69 to -0.34), vitamin B6 (600-1200 mg/d for ≥5 days; SMD, -0.92; 95% CI, -1.57 to -0.26), trazodone (50 mg/d for ≥5 days; SMD, -0.84; 95% CI, -1.54 to -0.14), mianserin (15 mg/d for ≥5 days; SMD, -0.81; 95% CI, -1.44 to -0.19), and propranolol (20 mg/d for ≥6 days; SMD, -0.78; 95% CI, -1.35 to -0.22) were associated with greater efficacy than placebo, with low to moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 34.6%; 95% CI, 0.0%-71.1%). Cyproheptadine, clonazepam, zolmitriptan, and valproate did not yield significant effects. Eight trials were rated as having low risk of bias; 2, moderate risk; and 5, high risk. Sensitivity analyses generally confirmed the results for all drugs except for cyproheptadine and propranolol. No association between effect sizes and psychotic severity was found.Conclusions and relevanceIn this systematic review and network meta-analysis, mirtazapine, biperiden, and vitamin B6 were associated with the greatest efficacy for AIA, with vitamin B6 having the best efficacy and tolerance profile. Trazodone, mianserin, and propranolol appeared as effective alternatives with slightly less favorable efficacy and tolerance profiles. These findings should assist prescribers in selecting an appropriate medication for treating AIA.
Abstract licence: CC BY
M. Foresti, Eliana Garzon, Mariana Teichner de Moraes, et al.
Frontiers in Neurology, 2023
Miguel Siqueira Campos, Andréia Gomes Bezerra, Daniela Fernández Curado, et al.
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 2024
- Biperiden
- Crack Cocaine
- Cocaine-Related Disorders
Romariz SAA, Marinelli BPT, Bergo MFC, et al.
2026
BackgroundTraumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of disability, with post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE) being a major complication. Biperiden has shown experimental potential in preventing epileptogenesis, however its impact on outcomes, such as quality of life (QoL), remains unknown. This study evaluated long-term QoL in TBI survivors treated with biperiden and identified clinical and socioeconomic predictors of their QoL.MethodsWe analyzed QoL data from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 48 adults with moderate to severe TBI, assessed on average 32 months post-injury. QoL was measured using the EQ-5D-3 L questionnaire. A cross-sectional analysis identified predictors of QoL using Generalized Linear Models (GLMs), and a longitudinal analysis of a 14-participant subgroup assessed changes over time using a paired t-test.ResultsEarly treatment with biperiden did not significantly alter QoL compared to placebo. However, the study identified significant negative predictors for QoL: the presence of PTE (β = -0.23, p = 0.02), temporal lobe lesion (β = -0.22, p = 0.006), and being a beneficiary (p = 0.002). QoL scores significantly improved between 11.6 months (0.457) and 27.1 months (0.678) post-TBI (p = 0.004). Descriptively, while mobility and self-care were well-preserved, the anxiety/depression dimension was the most affected dimension, with 22.5% of participants reporting extreme problems.ConclusionsBiperiden did not impact QoL in TBI survivors. However, improvements were observed in the approximately 2 years following injury. Predictors like PTE, temporal lesions and receiving benefits as income were associated with lower Qol score. These preliminary findings guide future interventions for TBI patients and are particularly important as they fill a data gap for the Brazilian population.Trial registrationThe trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, a database managed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM) and National Institutes of Health (NIH), under the identifier NCT01048138 on January 13, 2010.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Calio M, Santos L, Mosini A, et al.
2025
C. J. G. Bakker, Michiel J. van Esdonk, Rik Stuurman, et al.
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2021
- Attention
- Biperiden
- Cognition
Maira Licia Foresti, Eliana Garzón, Carla Cristina Gomes Pinheiro, et al.
PLoS ONE, 2022
- Biperiden
- Epilepsy, Post-Traumatic
- Quality of Life
BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the most important causes of acquired structural epilepsy, post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE), however, efficient preventative measures and treatment are still not available to patients. Preclinical studies indicated biperiden, an anticholinergic drug, as a potential drug to modify the epileptogenic process. The main objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy of biperiden as an antiepileptogenic agent in patients that suffered TBI. METHODS: This prospective multicenter (n = 10) interventional study will include 312 adult patients admitted to emergency care units with a diagnosis of moderate or severe TBI. Following inclusion and exclusion criteria, patients will be randomized, using block randomization, to receive double-blind treatment with placebo or biperiden for 10 days. Follow-up will occur at specific time windows up to 2 years. Main outcomes are incidence of PTE after TBI and occurrence of severe adverse events. Other outcomes include exploratory investigation of factors that might have benefits for the treatment or might influence its results, such as genetic background, clinical progression, electroencephalographic abnormalities, health-related quality of life and neuropsychological status. Analyses will be conducted following the safety, intention-to-treat and efficacy concepts. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that biperiden treatment will be effective to prevent or mitigate the development of post-traumatic epilepsy in TBI patients. Other health measures from this population also may benefit from treatment with biperiden. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04945213. Registered on June 30, 2021.
Abstract licence: CC BY 4.0
Luiz Henrique Junqueira Dieckmann, Anna Carolina Ramos, Eroy Aparecida da Silva, et al.
European Neuropsychopharmacology, 2014
- Analysis of Variance
- Biperiden
- Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
P. König, I. Pass-Kosmath
Clinical Experiences with Budipine in Parkinson Therapy, 1985
C. Roncero, M. Casas, S. Valero, et al.
European Psychiatry, 2014
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Pharmacology and chemical data from DrugBank
Key facts
Drug status
Approved
Major interactions
None known
Half-life
Not available
Mechanism
Parkinsonism is thought to result from an imbalance between the excitatory (chol…
Food interactions
2 warnings
Human targets
1 target
Data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Pharmacokinetics at a glance
Absorption
87%
Protein binding
60%
Metabolism
Pharmacokinetic data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Known interactions with other medications. Always consult a healthcare professional.
Showing 50 of 716 interactions
How the body processes this drug — absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination
Proteins and enzymes this drug interacts with in the body
Enzymes involved in drug metabolism — important for understanding drug interactions
ATC N04AA02
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Show
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Linked compound data from DrugBank Open Data (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Biperiden
Additional database identifiers
Drugs Product Database (DPD)
6471
ChemSpider
2289
BindingDB
50240680
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:1950
GenAtlas
CHRM1
GeneCards
CHRM1
GenBank Gene Database
X52068
GenBank Protein Database
34451
Guide to Pharmacology
13
UniProt Accession
ACM1_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:2625
GenAtlas
CYP2D6
GeneCards
CYP2D6
GenBank Gene Database
M20403
GenBank Protein Database
181350
Guide to Pharmacology
1329
UniProt Accession
CP2D6_HUMAN
DrugBank citations
If you use DrugBank data in your research, please cite the following publications:
Show earlier publications
Structured knowledge from the free knowledge base
ATC classifications (Wikidata)
Linked open data from Wikidata (Q414914), a free and open knowledge base operated by the Wikimedia Foundation. Data is available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication. WHO INN from the World Health Organization.