Betamethasone dipropionate 0.064% / Clotrimazole 1% cream
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Betamethasone + Clotrimazole
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
7 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Betamethasone + Clotrimazole on the MHRA register
Lotriderm cream
Lotriderm cream
Lotriderm cream
Lotriderm cream
This is the NHS Drug Tariff indicative price used for reimbursement purposes. It may not reflect the price paid by patients or pharmacies.
View full Drug TariffSource: NHS Drug Tariff via NHSBSA. Derived from dm+d VMPP (Virtual Medicinal Product Pack) pricing data. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 3 · Randomised trials: 4 · 1995–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
William G. Powderly, Dianne M. Finkelstein, Judith Feinberg, et al.
New England Journal of Medicine, 1995
Soni P, Garlapati K, Divya Harika P, et al.
2025
ContextOral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory mucocutaneous disease characterized by pain and burning sensation. As etiology remains unclear, the treatment of OLP is focused mainly on reducing symptoms through modulation of local immune response.AimsThe aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of Clobetasol 0.05% orabase and Betamethasone 0.05% orabase, both combined with Clotrimazole 1%, in managing symptomatic OLP.MethodologyA double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted on 30 patients diagnosed with OLP at a tertiary dental hospital. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group A (Clobetasol + Clotrimazole) and Group B (Betamethasone + Clotrimazole). Clinical response was assessed at two and four weeks using the Global Assessment Scale for lesion size and the visual analogue scale (VAS) for burning sensation. The collected data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 17 (Released 2009; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States).ResultsAt the end of four weeks, the change in mean size obtained was score 2.0±0.95 in Group A and 1.66±1.4 in Group B (p-value = 0.51), indicating that both the study drugs had a similar decrease in the global assessment of efficacy scores with no significant statistical difference. Mean change in the VAS score at the end of four weeks revealed a decrease in the mean score of 4.66±2.30 in Group A and a decrease by 4.00±1.80 score in Group B (p-value=0.44), indicating no statistical significance.ConclusionsBoth clobetasol and betamethasone demonstrated comparable efficacy in reducing pain and lesion size among patients with OLP. This finding suggests that either regimen can serve as a viable therapeutic option in the management of OLP. Considering their similar clinical outcomes, the choice between these corticosteroids may depend on factors such as drug availability, patient tolerance, cost, and physician preference.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Christy M. Isler, P.Scott Barrilleaux, Everett F. Magann, et al.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2001
Heike Wulff, George A. Gutman, Michael D. Cahalan, et al.
Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2001
Rajiv Nath, G. Misra, D. Kumar
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1996
Jung Yun Chang, Yu-Kyoung Oh, Hak Soo Kong, et al.
Journal of Controlled Release, 2002
W. S. Douglas, Y. Poulin, J. Decroix, et al.
Acta Dermato-Venereologica, 2002
Julia Penso, Rivka Beitner
European Journal of Pharmacology, 1998
Ahmed SM, Ahmed SF, Othman S, et al.
2021
IntroductionCushing syndrome (CS) is an endocrinological abnormality that results from a high level of glucocorticoids in the blood. Iatrogenic CS due to the overuse of topical corticosteroids is rarely reported. The current study aims to present a rare case of topical corticosteroid induced iatrogenic CS in an infant.Case presentationA 4-month-old female infant presented with an insidious onset of face puffiness that progressed over a 2-month period. The mother reported to have used a cream containing Betamethasone corticosteroid 5-8 times a day for a duration of 3 months to treat diaper dermatitis. Laboratory findings revealed low levels of adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) and serum. Abdominal ultrasound showed normal adrenal glands. The topical corticosteroid was halted and physiologic topical hydrocortisone doses were administered.Clinical discussionInfants are more likely to acquire topical corticosteroid induced iatrogenic CS due to their thin and absorptive skin, higher body surface area, and the high prevalence of conditions that necessitates the use of these medications. Most iatrogenic CS cases following topical steroid application have been reported in infants with diaper dermatitis that are most commonly treated with Clobetasol and Bethamethasone.ConclusionInfants are susceptible to develop CS due to topical corticosteroid overuse. Hence, physicians need to consider this in infantile CS cases, and take appropriate measures to avoid their occurrence.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Huseyin Aktas, Rudolf Flückiger, Juan A. Acosta, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1998
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.