Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Beclometasone
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
View EudraVigilance report
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Beclometasone
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
2 branded products available
Part of the Beclazone brand family (generic: Beclometasone)
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Beclometasone on the MHRA register
WHO defined daily dose (DDD)
800 microgram
Not a recommended dose. The DDD is the assumed average maintenance dose per day for a drug used for its main indication in adults. It is a statistical measure used for research and comparison purposes only.
Source: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, distributed via the NHS dm+d supplementary BNF/ATC mapping files (NHSBSA). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(1)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 8 · Randomised trials: 3 · 2002–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Alberto Papi, Massimo Corradi, Catherine Pigeon-Francisco, et al.
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 2013
- Formoterol Fumarate
- Administration, Inhalation
- Albuterol
Braido F, Vlachaki I, Nikolaidis GF, et al.
2025
- Asthma
- Glycopyrrolate
- Beclomethasone
M. Orlovic, G. Nikolaidis, D. Tzelis, et al.
Value in Health, 2023
Henrik Watz, Anne‐Marie Kirsten, Andrea Ludwig-Sengpiel, et al.
Respiratory Research, 2024
- Formoterol Fumarate
- Beclomethasone
- Drug Combinations
Wang R, Maidstone R, Singh D, et al.
2025
- Asthma
- Beclomethasone
- Adrenal Cortex Hormones
BackgroundAsthma demonstrates a robust daily rhythm, with airflow obstruction and airway inflammation peaking overnight. Aligning the timing of drug administration with rhythms in disease (chronotherapy) may improve therapeutic efficacy. We aimed to evaluate the impact of dosage timing for inhaled corticosteroids in asthma.MethodsThis is a randomised three-way crossover trial. Participants with mild to moderate atopic asthma were randomised to beclometasone dipropionate: (1) 400 µg once daily between 08:00 and 09:00 (ODAM); (2) 400 µg once daily between 15:00 and 16:00 (ODPM); and (3) 200 µg twice daily between 08:00 and 09:00 and between 20:00 and 21:00 (BD) for 28 days, with a 2 week washout period in between treatment periods. Six-hourly spirometry and biomarkers were measured over 24 hours following the run-in period and at the end of each treatment period.ResultsOf 25 participants, 21 completed all regimens. ODPM was superior in improving 22:00 FEV1 (median (IQR): +160 (+70, +270) ml) compared with ODAM (-20 (-80, +230) ml) and BD (+80 (-20, +200) ml). ODPM resulted in better overnight (22:00 and 04:00) suppression in blood eosinophil counts compared with BD and ODAM. All regimens improved asthma control and reduced fractional exhaled nitric oxide and serum cortisol levels with no difference among dosing regimens.ConclusionODPM better suppresses the nocturnal dip in lung function and peak of blood eosinophil counts compared with BD and ODAM; this was without an increase in adverse events. Future trials are warranted to validate these findings in real-life settings and to determine which population may best benefit from chronotherapy.
Abstract licence: CC BY
M. Corradi, H. Chrystyn, B. Cosío, et al.
Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, 2014
- Formoterol Fumarate
- Administration, Inhalation
- Asthma
Dave Singh, Massimo Corradi, Monica Spinola, et al.
npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, 2016
- Formoterol Fumarate
- Administration, Inhalation
- Beclomethasone
Mark Spears, Iona Donnelly, Lisa Jolly, et al.
European Respiratory Journal, 2009
- Administration, Inhalation
- Analysis of Variance
- Asthma
Fernando Rizzello, Paolo Gionchetti, A. D’Arienzo, et al.
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2002
Leonardo M. Fabbri, Gabriele Nicolini, Dario Olivieri, et al.
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, 2008
- Formoterol Fumarate
- Administration, Inhalation
- Aerosol Propellants
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Structured knowledge from the free knowledge base
Linked open data from Wikidata (Q421475), a free and open knowledge base operated by the Wikimedia Foundation. Data is available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.