Beclometasone 200micrograms/dose / Formoterol 6micrograms/dose inhaler CFC free

Recent literature has shown that triple therapy is more effective than dual therapy for individuals with uncontrolled asthma. However, the comparative efficacy between different triple therapies remains unclear. The objective of this study was to determine the comparative efficacy of extra-fine single-inhaler medium-dose (MD) or high-dose (HD) of beclometasone/formoterol/glycopyrronium bromide (BDP/FOR/GLY) compared to other triple therapies in patients whose asthma remains uncontrolled with MD or HD inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists. A systematic literature review identified randomized control trials on adult patients with uncontrolled asthma. Two separate networks were constructed according to patients' previous inhaled-corticosteroid dosage. Network meta-analyses evaluated severe and moderate-to-severe exacerbations, pre-dose forced expiratory volume, and asthma control questionnaire responses at 52 (± 3) weeks. Among single-inhaler triple therapies, MD BDP/FOR/GLY significantly reduced the risk of severe exacerbations (RR [95% CrI] compared to MD fluticasone/umeclidinium/vilanterol: 0.65 [0.49, 0.89]), while HD BDP/FOR/GLY demonstrated an improved trend in reducing severe and moderate-to-severe exacerbations versus HD indacaterol acetate/glycopyrronium bromide/mometasone, fluticasone/umeclidinium/vilanterol, and salmeterol/fluticasone + tiotropium. HD BDP/FOR/GLY and HD BDP/FOR + tiotropium did not differ significantly. Compared to relevant single-inhaler triple therapies, MD and HD BDP/FOR/GLY are associated with a significant benefit or trend for improvement in terms of reducing the rate of severe and moderate-to-severe exacerbations.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

BACKGROUND: The single-inhaler triple combination of beclometasone dipropionate, formoterol fumarate, and glycopyrronium (BDP/FF/G) is available for maintenance therapy of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Cardinal features of COPD are lung hyperinflation and reduced exercise capacity. TRIFORCE aimed to evaluate the effect of BDP/FF/G on lung hyperinflation and exercise capacity in patients with COPD. METHODS: This double-blind, randomised, active- and placebo-controlled, crossover study recruited adults with COPD aged ≥ 40 years, who were hyperinflated and symptomatic, and were receiving mono- or dual inhaled maintenance COPD therapy. In the three treatment periods, patients were randomised to receive BDP/FF/G, BDP/FF, or placebo, each for 3 weeks, with a 7-10-day washout between treatment periods. Assessments included slow inspiratory spirometry (for resting inspiratory capacity [IC]) and constant work-rate cycle ergometry (for dynamic IC and exercise endurance time). The primary objective was to compare BDP/FF/G and BDP/FF vs. placebo for resting IC at Week 3. Key secondary objectives were to compare BDP/FF/G and BDP/FF vs. placebo for dynamic IC and exercise endurance time during constant work rate cycle ergometry at Week 3. RESULTS: Of 106 patients randomised, 95 completed the study. Resting IC adjusted mean differences vs. placebo were 315 and 223 mL for BDP/FF/G and BDP/FF, respectively (p < 0.001 for both). Adjusted mean differences vs. placebo for the key secondary endpoints were: 245 mL for dynamic IC (p < 0.001) and 69.2 s for exercise endurance time (nominal p < 0.001) with BDP/FF/G, and 96 mL (p = 0.053) and 70.1 s (nominal p < 0.001) with BDP/FF. Differences between BDP/FF/G and BDP/FF for resting and dynamic IC were 92 and 149 mL (p < 0.01 for both). All three treatments were generally well tolerated, with 27.3%, 25.3% and 19.0% of patients reporting adverse events with BDP/FF/G, BDP/FF and placebo, respectively, all mild or moderate. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with COPD, BDP/FF/G provided significant and clinically relevant improvements vs. placebo and BDP/FF in static and dynamic hyperinflation, with an improvement vs. placebo in exercise endurance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05097014), registered 27th October 2021.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

BackgroundAsthma demonstrates a robust daily rhythm, with airflow obstruction and airway inflammation peaking overnight. Aligning the timing of drug administration with rhythms in disease (chronotherapy) may improve therapeutic efficacy. We aimed to evaluate the impact of dosage timing for inhaled corticosteroids in asthma.MethodsThis is a randomised three-way crossover trial. Participants with mild to moderate atopic asthma were randomised to beclometasone dipropionate: (1) 400 µg once daily between 08:00 and 09:00 (ODAM); (2) 400 µg once daily between 15:00 and 16:00 (ODPM); and (3) 200 µg twice daily between 08:00 and 09:00 and between 20:00 and 21:00 (BD) for 28 days, with a 2 week washout period in between treatment periods. Six-hourly spirometry and biomarkers were measured over 24 hours following the run-in period and at the end of each treatment period.ResultsOf 25 participants, 21 completed all regimens. ODPM was superior in improving 22:00 FEV1 (median (IQR): +160 (+70, +270) ml) compared with ODAM (-20 (-80, +230) ml) and BD (+80 (-20, +200) ml). ODPM resulted in better overnight (22:00 and 04:00) suppression in blood eosinophil counts compared with BD and ODAM. All regimens improved asthma control and reduced fractional exhaled nitric oxide and serum cortisol levels with no difference among dosing regimens.ConclusionODPM better suppresses the nocturnal dip in lung function and peak of blood eosinophil counts compared with BD and ODAM; this was without an increase in adverse events. Future trials are warranted to validate these findings in real-life settings and to determine which population may best benefit from chronotherapy.

Abstract licence: CC BY

BackgroundCombined ICS and long-acting bronchodilators (LABD) more effectively reduce COPD exacerbations than LABD therapy alone. Corticosteroid-related adverse effects, including pneumonia, limit ICS use. Previous data suggest this risk is lower for extrafine beclometasone (ef-BDP). We compared pneumonia risk among new users of fixed dose ICS/LABD formulations containing ef-BDP, versus patients initiating LABD without any ICS.MethodsA propensity-matched historical cohort study design used data from OPCRD. COPD patients with ≥1 year of continuous data who initiated LABD or ICS/LABD formulations containing ef-BDP were matched. Primary outcome was time to pneumonia event, as treated, using either sensitive (physician diagnosed) or specific (physician diagnosed and x-ray or hospital admission confirmed) definitions, with non-inferiority boundary of 15%.Results23,898 COPD patients were matched, who were 68±11 years, 54.3% male and 56% current-smokers, while 43% were former-smokers. Initiation of ef-BDP/LABD was not associated with an increased risk of pneumonia versus LABD, for either a sensitive 0.89 (0.78-1.02), P = 0.08 or a specific 0.91 (0.78-1.05), P = 0.18 definition of pneumonia. The probability of remaining pneumonia free 1-year after ef-BDP/LABD was 98.4%, which was comparable to LABD at 97.7%, and was sustained up to 6 years of observation; non-inferiority criterion was met for both definitions. Initiation of ef-BDP/LABD was also associated with a reduced risk of developing LRTIs in the propensity matched cohort.ConclusionRisk of pneumonia when using ICS for the management of COPD reported in several randomised controlled trials may not be relevant with ef-BDP in a diverse real-world clinical population.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC