Beclometasone 100micrograms/dose / Formoterol 6micrograms/dose inhaler CFC free

The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Strategy Report provides clinicians with an annually updated evidence-based strategy for asthma management and prevention, which can be adapted for local circumstances (e.g., medication availability). This article summarizes key recommendations from GINA 2021, and the evidence underpinning recent changes. GINA recommends that asthma in adults and adolescents should not be treated solely with short-acting β2-agonist (SABA), because of the risks of SABA-only treatment and SABA overuse, and evidence for benefit of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Large trials show that as-needed combination ICS-formoterol reduces severe exacerbations by ⩾60% in mild asthma compared with SABA alone, with similar exacerbation, symptom, lung function, and inflammatory outcomes as daily ICS plus as-needed SABA. Key changes in GINA 2021 include division of the treatment figure for adults and adolescents into two tracks. Track 1 (preferred) has low-dose ICS-formoterol as the reliever at all steps: as needed only in Steps 1-2 (mild asthma), and with daily maintenance ICS-formoterol (maintenance-and-reliever therapy, "MART") in Steps 3-5. Track 2 (alternative) has as-needed SABA across all steps, plus regular ICS (Step 2) or ICS-long-acting β2-agonist (Steps 3-5). For adults with moderate-to-severe asthma, GINA makes additional recommendations in Step 5 for add-on long-acting muscarinic antagonists and azithromycin, with add-on biologic therapies for severe asthma. For children 6-11 years, new treatment options are added at Steps 3-4. Across all age groups and levels of severity, regular personalized assessment, treatment of modifiable risk factors, self-management education, skills training, appropriate medication adjustment, and review remain essential to optimize asthma outcomes.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

BackgroundAsthma demonstrates a robust daily rhythm, with airflow obstruction and airway inflammation peaking overnight. Aligning the timing of drug administration with rhythms in disease (chronotherapy) may improve therapeutic efficacy. We aimed to evaluate the impact of dosage timing for inhaled corticosteroids in asthma.MethodsThis is a randomised three-way crossover trial. Participants with mild to moderate atopic asthma were randomised to beclometasone dipropionate: (1) 400 µg once daily between 08:00 and 09:00 (ODAM); (2) 400 µg once daily between 15:00 and 16:00 (ODPM); and (3) 200 µg twice daily between 08:00 and 09:00 and between 20:00 and 21:00 (BD) for 28 days, with a 2 week washout period in between treatment periods. Six-hourly spirometry and biomarkers were measured over 24 hours following the run-in period and at the end of each treatment period.ResultsOf 25 participants, 21 completed all regimens. ODPM was superior in improving 22:00 FEV1 (median (IQR): +160 (+70, +270) ml) compared with ODAM (-20 (-80, +230) ml) and BD (+80 (-20, +200) ml). ODPM resulted in better overnight (22:00 and 04:00) suppression in blood eosinophil counts compared with BD and ODAM. All regimens improved asthma control and reduced fractional exhaled nitric oxide and serum cortisol levels with no difference among dosing regimens.ConclusionODPM better suppresses the nocturnal dip in lung function and peak of blood eosinophil counts compared with BD and ODAM; this was without an increase in adverse events. Future trials are warranted to validate these findings in real-life settings and to determine which population may best benefit from chronotherapy.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC

BackgroundCombined ICS and long-acting bronchodilators (LABD) more effectively reduce COPD exacerbations than LABD therapy alone. Corticosteroid-related adverse effects, including pneumonia, limit ICS use. Previous data suggest this risk is lower for extrafine beclometasone (ef-BDP). We compared pneumonia risk among new users of fixed dose ICS/LABD formulations containing ef-BDP, versus patients initiating LABD without any ICS.MethodsA propensity-matched historical cohort study design used data from OPCRD. COPD patients with ≥1 year of continuous data who initiated LABD or ICS/LABD formulations containing ef-BDP were matched. Primary outcome was time to pneumonia event, as treated, using either sensitive (physician diagnosed) or specific (physician diagnosed and x-ray or hospital admission confirmed) definitions, with non-inferiority boundary of 15%.Results23,898 COPD patients were matched, who were 68±11 years, 54.3% male and 56% current-smokers, while 43% were former-smokers. Initiation of ef-BDP/LABD was not associated with an increased risk of pneumonia versus LABD, for either a sensitive 0.89 (0.78-1.02), P = 0.08 or a specific 0.91 (0.78-1.05), P = 0.18 definition of pneumonia. The probability of remaining pneumonia free 1-year after ef-BDP/LABD was 98.4%, which was comparable to LABD at 97.7%, and was sustained up to 6 years of observation; non-inferiority criterion was met for both definitions. Initiation of ef-BDP/LABD was also associated with a reduced risk of developing LRTIs in the propensity matched cohort.ConclusionRisk of pneumonia when using ICS for the management of COPD reported in several randomised controlled trials may not be relevant with ef-BDP in a diverse real-world clinical population.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC