Avanafil 50mg tablets
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Avanafil is a phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitor used in the treatment of erectile dysfunction.
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Avanafil
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
View EudraVigilance report
Suspected adverse reactions reported for Avanafil
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Avanafil on the MHRA register
Spedra 50mg tablets
This is the NHS Drug Tariff indicative price used for reimbursement purposes. It may not reflect the price paid by patients or pharmacies.
View full Drug TariffSource: NHS Drug Tariff via NHSBSA. Derived from dm+d VMPP (Virtual Medicinal Product Pack) pricing data. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
WHO defined daily dose (DDD)
100 mg
Not a recommended dose. The DDD is the assumed average maintenance dose per day for a drug used for its main indication in adults. It is a statistical measure used for research and comparison purposes only.
Source: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, distributed via the NHS dm+d supplementary BNF/ATC mapping files (NHSBSA). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NICE clinical guidance(2)
Erectile dysfunction: avanafil (ESNM45)
Erectile dysfunction: Alprostadil cream (ESNM50)
Source: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing all 29 studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 3 · 2023–2026
Showing all 29 studies, sorted by most relevant.
S. Warli, S. Steven, D. Kadar, et al.
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, 2023
Purpose: Erectile dysfunction (ED) contributes to a large burden and impairs the quality of life among males. Avanafil appears to be a promising treatment for ED; however, its efficacy and safety profile remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of avanafil for the treatment of ED. Patients and Methods: An extensive search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Embase databases with 11 publications was performed, with outcomes evaluated are International Index of Erectile Function - Erectile Function (IIEF-EF), Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP), and Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE). Statistical parameter Mean Difference (MD) and Risk Ratio (RR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) were used to measure effect size. Results: The pooled estimates demonstrated that changes in IIEF-EF function (MD=4.39, 95% CI [3.41, 5.37], p<0.001), SEP-2 (RR=3.43, 95% CI [2.79, 4.22], p<0.001), SEP-3 (RR=2.30, 95% CI [2.01, 2.62], p<0.001), and TEAE (RR=1.49, 95% CI [1.12, 1.96], p=0.005) were significantly higher in the avanafil group than in the placebo group. Moreover, 200 mg avanafil was superior to that mg 100 mg-avanafil, indicated by the IIEF-EF score (MD=-1.15, 95% CI [-1.40, -0.89], p<0.001). In contrary, there were no significant differences in SEP-2 (RR=0.90, 95% CI [0.75, 1.08], p=0.26), SEP-3 (RR=0.92, 95% CI [0.81, 1.05], p=0.21) and TEAE (RR=1.00, 95% CI [0.87, 1.15], p=0.99) for both 100 mg and 200 mg doses. Conclusion: This review highlights the potential use of this drug in ED treatment. Further large-scale Randomized Controlled Trials investigations involving various racial groups are required to confirm these findings.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Joseph Kim, Rui Zhao, Lawrence Richard Kleinberg, et al.
EClinicalMedicine, 2025
<h2>Summary</h2><h3>Background</h3> Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors, owing to their mechanism of action, have been gaining recognition as a potential case of drug repurposing and combination therapy for diabetes treatment. We aimed to examine the effect of long and short half-life PDE5 inhibitors have on Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels. <h3>Methods</h3> A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in people with elevated HbA1c (>6%) to assess mean difference in HbA1c levels from baseline versus controls after any PDE5 inhibitor intervention of ≥4 weeks, excluding multiple interventions. Cochrane CENTRAL, PMC Medline, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP were searched without language restrictions up to September 30, 2024. Summary data from published data were extracted. PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines used to extract and assess data using a random-effects meta-analysis. This study is registered with the Research Registry, reviewregistry1733. <h3>Findings</h3> Among 1096 studies identified, in analysis of 13 studies with 1083 baseline patients, long half-life PDE5 inhibitors (tadalafil, PF-00489791) had decreases in HbA1c while short half-life PDE5 inhibitors (sildenafil, avanafil) had no change. Five (38.5%) studies had a low risk of bias, and eight (61.5%) had some concerns. Long half-life inhibitors had significant mean decrease of −0.40% ([−0.66, −0.14], p = 0.002, I<sup>2</sup> = 82%, 7.70% baseline HbA1c). Short half-life inhibitors had insignificant mean difference of +0.08% ([−0.16, 0.33], p = 0.51, I<sup>2</sup> = 40%, 7.73% baseline HbA1c). In ≥8-week trials with participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and mean HbA1c ≥ 6.5%, long half-life inhibitors had significant mean decrease of −0.50% ([−0.83, −0.17], I<sup>2</sup> = 88%, p = 0.003); short half-life inhibitors had significant mean increase of +0.36% ([0.03, 0.68], I<sup>2</sup> = 3%, p = 0.03). <h3>Interpretation</h3> At the well-controlled HbA1c of the participants, previous literature shows current diabetes treatments have similar HbA1c decreases, so the HbA1c mean difference of long half-life PDE5 inhibitors may indeed be clinically relevant. This suggests future investigation into PDE5 inhibitors as part of combination therapy or as therapy for high HbA1c individuals is needed, especially because of variable risk of biases, homogeneity, and sample sizes in our study. <h3>Funding</h3> None.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Yucong Zhang, Hao Peng, Sheng Xin, et al.
Systematic Reviews, 2025
- Erectile Dysfunction
- Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors
- Blood Pressure
BACKGROUND: Phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors (PDE5is) are used for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) and have potential cardioprotective effects. The impacts of PDE5is on cardiovascular parameters, which may be associated with the occurrence and progression of subclinical cardiovascular diseases, remain uncertain. In this study, we evaluated the effects of PDE5is on vascular parameters. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effects of PDE5is and placebo on vascular parameters and were published from 1998 to 2022 were identified from PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. Mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to confirm the robustness of the pooled results. The keywords that were searched in the databases are as follows: ((systolic blood pressure) OR (SBP) OR (diastolic blood pressure) OR (DBP) OR (mean arterial pressure) OR (MAP) OR (Pulse Wave Velocity) OR (PWV) OR (intima-media thickness) OR (cIMT) OR (augmentation Index) OR (AI) OR (FMD) OR (flow-mediated dilation) OR (reactive hyperemia index) OR (RHI) OR (Endothelial microparticles) OR (EMP) OR (EPCs) OR (Endothelial Progenitor Cells) OR (PSV) OR (peak systolic velocity)) AND ((PDE5 Inhibitors) OR (PDE5i) OR (Sildenafil) OR (Vardenafil) OR (Tadalafil) OR (Lodenafil) OR (Udenafil) OR (Avanafil)). RESULTS: Sixty-three studies involving 3242 subjects were included. Overall, PDE5is decreased systolic blood pressure (MD: -2.80 mmHg, 95% CI: -4.24, -1.37, P < 0.001), diastolic blood pressure (MD: -1.80 mmHg, 95% CI: -2.37, -1.22, P < 0.001), carotid intima‒media thickness (MD: -0.01 mm, 95% CI: -0.02, -0.01, P < 0.001), and pulse wave velocity (MD: -0.75 cm/s, 95% CI: -1.01, -0.49, P < 0.001). In addition, PDE5is increased the peak systolic velocity (MD: 3.70 cm/s, 95% CI: 3.52, 3.88, P < 0.001), flow-mediated dilation (MD: 2.47%, 95% CI: 1.24, 3.71, P < 0.001), concentration of endothelial progenitor cells (MD: 475.29 cells/mL, 95% CI: 51.38, 899.20, P = 0.03), and concentration of endothelial microparticles (MD: 4.86%, 95% CI: 0.65, 9.07, P = 0.02). However, the effects of PDE5is on the augmentation index, brachial artery diameter and reactive hyperemia index were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Compared with the placebo, PDE5is improved vascular parameters, indicating the potential of PDE5is for treating subclinical cardiovascular diseases. Further research is needed to confirm the role of the improvement on vascular parameters by PDE5isin preventing and treating cardiovascular diseases. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The present study protocol was reviewed and approved by PROSPERO. The title is "Associations between PDE5is and vascular parameters: A systematic review and meta-analysis" ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ ) (Reg. No. CRD42023387924).
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Walaa Nabil Abd-AlGhafar, R. Abo Shabana, R. El-Shaheny, et al.
Luminescence : the journal of biological and chemical luminescence, 2024
- Pyrimidines
- Tadalafil
- Duloxetine Hydrochloride
S. Derayea, Hadeer A Elhamdy, Mohamed Oraby, et al.
BMC Chemistry, 2024
The simultaneous assay of duloxetine hydrochloride (DLX) and avanafil (AVN) in their pure forms, synthetic mixtures, and spiked human plasma was achieved using a novel, eco-friendly, sensitive, and specific HPTLC methodology that have been established and validated. Measuring the levels of co-administered antidepressants and sexual stimulants in biological fluids is an important step for individuals with depression and sexual problems. Separation was performed successfully using pre-coated silica gel 60-F254 as a stationary phase and a mobile phase composed of methanol, acetone, and 33% ammonia (8:2:0.05, v/v/v). Compact bands were produced by the optimized mobile phase that was chosen for development (Rf values were 0.23 and 0.75 for DLX and AVN, individually) after dual-wavelength detection for DLX and AVN at 232 and 253 nm, respectively. The results of polynomial regression analysis were exceptional (r = 0.9999 for both medicines) over concentration ranges of 5-800 and 10-800ng/spot for DLX and AVN, respectively. The quantitation limits were 4.69 and 9.53 ng/spot (0.31 and 0.94 µg/mL), whereas the detection limits were 1.55 and 3.15 ng/spot (0.63 and 1.91 µg/mL), for DLX and AVN, respectively. The International Council for Harmonization (ICH) criteria served as the basis for validating the established approach. Moreover, the proposed technique was evaluated in terms of greenness using four contemporary ecological metrics: The Analytical Greenness software (AGREE), the Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI), Eco-Scale, and the National Environmental Method Index (NEMI). Additionally, the Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI), a newly developed tool for evaluating the practicality (blueness) of procedures, was taken into consideration when evaluating the sustainability levels of the established approach.
Abstract licence: CC BY
A. Barseem, R. Obaydo, S. Elagamy
Talanta Open, 2025
• A green, sensitive micelle-enhanced spectrofluorimetric method was developed for Avanafil quantification. • SDS significantly enhanced the weak native fluorescence of Avanafil, improving detection sensitivity. • The method is successfully applied to pharmaceutical dosage forms with high accuracy and precision. • Sustainability assessments (Eco-Scale and WAC) confirmed superior greenness and analytical efficiency compared to reported methods. A simple, rapid, eco-friendly, and highly sensitive micelle-enhanced spectrofluorimetric method was developed for the determination of Avanafil (AVA) in pharmaceutical formulations. The method is based on the enhancement of AVA native fluorescence through micelle formation with the anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). The fluorescence intensity significantly increased upon micellar interaction, and measurements were recorded at 385 nm following excitation at 310 nm. The method was carefully optimized with respect to critical parameters, including the pH of the system, the volume of SDS, and the type of diluting solvent to achieve maximum sensitivity and reproducibility. A linear response was obtained over the concentration range of 100–1200 ng mL -1 , with a detection limit of 20 ng mL -1 and a quantitation limit of 70 ng mL -1 . The developed method was applied for the determination of the drug in spiked human plasma samples with an average percent recovery of 98.65%. Therefore, it is suitable for pharmacokinetic studies and therapeutic monitoring of AVA. The proposed method was validated according to ICH guidelines, demonstrating excellent linearity, accuracy, precision, and robustness. Statistical comparison with a previously reported HPLC method revealed no significant differences in accuracy or precision, confirming the reliability of the proposed approach. Additionally, the greenness and whiteness of the method were evaluated using established assessment tools, highlighting its environmental sustainability compared to other reported methods.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Ping-Ju Tsai, Shih-Ya Hung, Ts Lee, et al.
Sexual Medicine, 2024
Background: Avanafil is a second-generation phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor, and offers a rapid onset of action (15 minutes). Its real-world data, including treatment satisfaction, are still lacking. Aim: The study sought to investigate the treatment outcomes of avanafil and the factors impacting treatment satisfaction in a real-world setting. Methods: Between November 2021 and February 2023, erectile dysfunction (ED) patients prescribed avanafil were consecutively enrolled in this phase 4, open-label, cross-sectional, observational study. At each follow-up visit (4-week intervals), participants completed a questionnaire for assessing the use and treatment-emergent adverse events of avanafil, ED severity, and treatment satisfaction. Outcomes: The outcome measures included the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM), and Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction. Results: < .001). Of the patients treated with avanafil, 71.4% (n = 80 of 112) reported a >4-point improvement in the SHIM total score, and 33.1% (n = 37 of 112) reported normal erectile function. The proportion of patients satisfied with avanafil treatment (defined as Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction index score ≥60) was 87.5%. Several physical factors (younger age, lower waist circumference, and lower level of low-density lipoprotein), and sexual function factors (shorter duration of ED, higher SHIM total score at baseline, PDE5 inhibitor treatment naive, and acquired premature ejaculation) tended to contribute to satisfaction with avanafil treatment. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 41.1% of patients, and all were mild in severity. Clinical Implications: This study identifies the factors associated with treatment satisfaction of avanafil, which may ultimately lead to better treatment outcomes. Strengths and Limitations: This is the first study to provide real-world evidence of avanafil for ED treatment, and validated questionnaires were used to assess erectile function and treatment satisfaction. However, the limitations of this study include single-center observational study design, small sample size, and short-term follow-up. Conclusion: Avanafil is an effective treatment for ED, and satisfaction rate is high in an outpatient setting. The awareness of identified factors related to patient satisfaction may improve treatment outcomes.
Abstract licence: CC BY
K. El-Say, Omar D. Al-hejaili, Hossam S. El-Sawy, et al.
Drug Delivery and Translational Research, 2023
- Chemistry, Pharmaceutical
- Deoxycholic Acid
- Administration, Buccal
Profiles of Drug Substances, Excipients and Related Methodology, 2024
- Erectile Dysfunction
- Hemodynamics
- Pyrimidines
Dr. Suhas Shivaji Siddheshwar, A. Jadhav, Dr. Someshwar Dattatraya Mankar, et al.
Journal of Molecular Structure, 2025
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Pharmacology and chemical data from DrugBank
Key facts
Drug status
Approved
Major interactions
51 found
Half-life
5 - 17 hours
Mechanism
Avanafil inhibits the cGMP-specific phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) which is res…
Food interactions
2 warnings
Human targets
1 target
Data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
Pharmacokinetics at a glance
Absorption
30-45 minutes
[L32113]…
Half-life
5 - 17 hours
[L32113]
Protein binding
99%
Volume of distribution
47 to 83 L
[L32113]
Metabolism
23%
[L32058][L32233]…
Elimination
62%
Pharmacokinetic data: DrugBank · CC BY-NC 4.0
It first received FDA approval on April 27, 2012,[L32058] with subsequent EMA approval in June 2013.[L32113]
[L32058]
Known interactions with other medications. Always consult a healthcare professional.
Showing 50 of 1270 interactions
[L32233]
Patients experiencing an overdosage of avanafil should be treated with standard symptomatic and supportive measures. Dialysis is unlikely to be of benefit in cases of overdose as avanafil is highly protein-bound in plasma.
[L32058]
As PDE5 inhibitors like avanafil require the endogenous release of nitric oxide in order to exert their pharmacologic effect, they have no effect on the user in the absence of sexual stimulation/arousal.[L32058][L32113]
PDE5 inhibitors like avanafil can cause significant drug interactions when administered alongside certain antihypertensive agents (e.g. alpha blockers, substantial amounts of alcohol).[L32058] PDE5 inhibitors have also been associated with the development of non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), a rare condition that typically presents as sudden loss of vision in one or both eyes and appears to be more common in patients with a "crowded" optic disc. Patients presenting with any degree of vision loss should immediately discontinue use of all PDE5 inhibitors and seek medical attention.[L32058] In some jurisdictions, a history of NAION or other degenerative retinal disorders is considered a contraindication to avanafil therapy.[L32233]
How the body processes this drug — absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination
[L32113]
Administration with a meal results in a mean delay in Tmax of 1.12 to 1.25 hours, a 39% mean reduction in Cmax, and a negligible effect on AUC.
[L32058][L32113]
[L32113]
[L32113]
[L32113]
[L32058][L32233]
There are two major metabolites formed, M4 and M16, which exist in the plasma at concentrations 23% and 29% that of the parent compound, respectively. The M16 metabolite lacks pharmacologic effect, but the M4 metabolite has an inhibitory potency for PDE5 18% that of avanafil and accounts for approximately 4% of the observed pharmacologic activity of avanafil.
[L32058]
[L32058]
Proteins and enzymes this drug interacts with in the body
PMID:15489334 PMID:9714779
Specifically regulates nitric-oxide-generated cGMP PMID:15489334
Enzymes involved in drug metabolism — important for understanding drug interactions
Proteins that transport this drug across cell membranes
PMID:2897240 PMID:35970996 PMID:8898203 PMID:9038218 PMID:35507548
Catalyzes the flop of phospholipids from the cytoplasmic to the exoplasmic leaflet of the apical membrane. Participates mainly to the flop of phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, beta-D-glucosylceramides and sphingomyelins .
PMID:8898203
Energy-dependent efflux pump responsible for decreased drug accumulation in multidrug-resistant cells PMID:2897240 PMID:35970996 PMID:9038218
PMID:11306452 PMID:12958161 PMID:19506252 PMID:20705604 PMID:28554189 PMID:30405239 PMID:31003562
Involved in porphyrin homeostasis, mediating the export of protoporphyrin IX (PPIX) from both mitochondria to cytosol and cytosol to extracellular space, it also functions in the cellular export of heme .
PMID:20705604 PMID:23189181
Also mediates the efflux of sphingosine-1-P from cells .
PMID:20110355
Acts as a urate exporter functioning in both renal and extrarenal urate excretion .
PMID:19506252 PMID:20368174 PMID:22132962 PMID:31003562 PMID:36749388
In kidney, it also functions as a physiological exporter of the uremic toxin indoxyl sulfate (By similarity). Also involved in the excretion of steroids like estrone 3-sulfate/E1S, 3beta-sulfooxy-androst-5-en-17-one/DHEAS, and other sulfate conjugates .
PMID:12682043 PMID:28554189 PMID:30405239
Mediates the secretion of the riboflavin and biotin vitamins into milk (By similarity). Extrudes pheophorbide a, a phototoxic porphyrin catabolite of chlorophyll, reducing its bioavailability (By similarity).
Plays an important role in the exclusion of xenobiotics from the brain (Probable). It confers to cells a resistance to multiple drugs and other xenobiotics including mitoxantrone, pheophorbide, camptothecin, methotrexate, azidothymidine, and the anthracyclines daunorubicin and doxorubicin, through the control of their efflux .
PMID:11306452 PMID:12477054 PMID:15670731 PMID:18056989 PMID:31254042
In placenta, it limits the penetration of drugs from the maternal plasma into the fetus (By similarity). May play a role in early stem cell self-renewal by blocking differentiation (By similarity).
In inflammatory macrophages, exports itaconate from the cytosol to the extracellular compartment and limits the activation of TFEB-dependent lysosome biogenesis involved in antibacterial innate immune response
Proteins that carry this drug through the body
PMID:19021548
Major calcium and magnesium transporter in plasma, binds approximately 45% of circulating calcium and magnesium in plasma (By similarity).
Potentially has more than two calcium-binding sites and might additionally bind calcium in a non-specific manner (By similarity). The shared binding site between zinc and calcium at residue Asp-273 suggests a crosstalk between zinc and calcium transport in the blood (By similarity). The rank order of affinity is zinc > calcium > magnesium (By similarity).
Binds to the bacterial siderophore enterobactin and inhibits enterobactin-mediated iron uptake of E.coli from ferric transferrin, and may thereby limit the utilization of iron and growth of enteric bacteria such as E.coli .
PMID:6234017
Does not prevent iron uptake by the bacterial siderophore aerobactin PMID:6234017
Appears to function in modulating the activity of the immune system during the acute-phase reaction
ATC G04BE10
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Show
Chemical identifiers
CAS, UNII, InChI Key and database cross-references
Linked compound data from DrugBank Open Data (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Avanafil
Additional database identifiers
ChemSpider
8045620
BindingDB
235766
PDB
E6L
ZINC
ZINC000011677857
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:8784
GenAtlas
PDE5A
GeneCards
PDE5A
GenBank Gene Database
AF043731
GenBank Protein Database
3420185
Guide to Pharmacology
1304
UniProt Accession
PDE5A_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:2637
GenAtlas
CYP3A4
GeneCards
CYP3A4
GenBank Gene Database
M18907
Guide to Pharmacology
1337
UniProt Accession
CP3A4_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:2623
GenAtlas
CYP2C9
GeneCards
CYP2C9
GenBank Gene Database
AY341248
Guide to Pharmacology
1326
UniProt Accession
CP2C9_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:399
GenAtlas
ALB
GeneCards
ALB
GenBank Gene Database
V00494
GenBank Protein Database
28590
UniProt Accession
ALBU_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:8498
GenAtlas
ORM1
GeneCards
ORM1
GenBank Gene Database
X02544
GenBank Protein Database
757907
UniProt Accession
A1AG1_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:40
GenAtlas
ABCB1
GeneCards
ABCB1
GenBank Gene Database
M14758
GenBank Protein Database
307180
Guide to Pharmacology
768
UniProt Accession
MDR1_HUMAN
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC)
HGNC:74
GenAtlas
ABCG2
GeneCards
ABCG2
GenBank Gene Database
AF103796
GenBank Protein Database
4185796
Guide to Pharmacology
792
UniProt Accession
ABCG2_HUMAN
DrugBank citations
If you use DrugBank data in your research, please cite the following publications:
Show earlier publications
Structured knowledge from the free knowledge base
ATC classifications (Wikidata)
Linked open data from Wikidata (Q2873270), a free and open knowledge base operated by the Wikimedia Foundation. Data is available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication. WHO INN from the World Health Organization.