Amikacin liposomal 590mg nebuliser dispersion vials with device
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
1 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Amikacin liposomal on the MHRA register
Arikayce liposomal 590mg nebuliser dispersion vials with Lamira Nebuliser Handset
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing the 50 most relevant studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 22 · Randomised trials: 4 · 2002–2026
Showing the 50 most relevant studies, sorted by most relevant.
Kenneth N. Olivier, David E. Griffith, Gina Eagle, et al.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2016
- Administration, Inhalation
- Amikacin
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
Charles Haworth, Diana Bilton, James D. Chalmers, et al.
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 2019
Jiayi Chen, Siyuan Hu, Man Sun, et al.
European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2024
Esteban Beltrán-Gracia, Adolfo López-Camacho, Inocencio Higuera‐Ciapara, et al.
Cancer Nanotechnology, 2019
K. Aloss, P. Hamar
Pharmaceutics, 2023
Marieke G. G. Sturkenboom, Noviana Simbar, Onno W. Akkerman, et al.
Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2018
- Amikacin
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
- Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Srivastava S, Gumbo T
2026
- Lung Diseases
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
- Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous
Guideline-based combination therapy achieves sputum culture conversion rates in 23%-34% of patients with Mycobacterium abscessus-complex lung disease. Thus, new therapies are needed. We performed a systematic review to validate and benchmark the hollow fiber system model of M. abscessus lung disease for drug development. We performed a literature search to identify all published hollow fiber system pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses was used for bias minimization. A total of 12 studies were identified. The average quality score was 13.7 out of 21. Eight were monotherapy (exposure-effect and dose-fractionation), one double β-lactam, and three guideline-based therapy studies. For omadacycline and imipenem, hollow fiber system data were accompanied by clinical real-world evidence confirmation. Microbial kill was always terminated by antimicrobial resistance. We used quantitative analyses to rank drugs' efficacy based on CFU/mL kill below day 0 bacterial burden normalized to multi-drug guideline-based therapy kill. The highest-ranked drugs were sulbactam-durlobactam-ceftriaxone (177-fold), epetraborole (15-fold), and omadacycline (7-fold) better than guideline-based therapy. We used the target exposures identified in the systematic analysis in Monte Carlo experiments to identify optimal doses for inhaled formulations. The optimal inhalational dose of imipenem was 250 mg/day, for tigecycline 4 mg/day, for cefoxitin 50 mg/day, and for amikacin liposome inhalation suspension 590 mg once weekly. The hollow fiber system model of M. abscessus lung disease is tractable for exposure-effect, dose-fractionation, and factorial design combination studies. It could also be used to rank drugs and inform on which drugs to test in novel combinations.IMPORTANCECurrent treatments for Mycobacterium abscessus lung disease fail in 70%-80% of patients and are toxic. The hollow fiber system has been used to study old and new potential treatments for this disease. We performed a systematic review of this methodology, for lessons learned. We found 12 studies, which were of adequate quality. Efficacy was always terminated by antimicrobial resistance. The top three drugs in terms of efficacy were sulbactam-durlobactam-ceftriaxone, epetraborole, and omadacycline, which were 7 to 177 times better than standard of care. These drugs could be combined into a new treatment regimen better than current treatments. We also calculated new doses for imipenem, tigecycline, cefoxitin, and amikacin when administered as inhalational therapy. The inhaled doses were multiple-fold lower than intravenous ones, which could be less toxic. The hollow fiber system model is an easily managed system from drug development and dose finding for M. abscessus lung disease.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Rocha-Romero A, Chaverri-Fernandez JM, Chaves-Fernández F, et al.
2025
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly used to support critically ill adults with severe cardiac or respiratory failure, but ECMO circuits and the physiological disturbances of critical illness significantly alter drug pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD), complicating dosing and monitoring. This narrative review synthesizes current clinical evidence on ECMO-related PK/PD alterations and provides practical guidance for optimizing pharmacotherapy in adult intensive care. A structured literature search (January-May 2025) was conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Sage Journals, ScienceDirect, Taylor & Francis Online, SpringerLink, and specialized databases, focusing on seven therapeutic classes commonly used in ECMO patients. Eligible studies included clinical trials, observational studies, systematic reviews, and practice guidelines in adults, while pediatric and preclinical data were excluded. Evidence quality varied substantially across drug classes. Hydrophilic, low-protein-bound agents such as β-lactams, aminoglycosides, fluconazole, and caspofungin generally showed minimal ECMO-specific PK alterations, with dose adjustment mainly driven by renal function. Conversely, lipophilic and highly protein-bound drugs including fentanyl, midazolam, propofol, voriconazole, and liposomal amphotericin B exhibited substantial circuit adsorption and variability, often requiring higher loading doses, prolonged infusions, and rigorous therapeutic drug monitoring. No ECMO-specific data were identified for certain neuromuscular blockers, antivirals, and electrolytes. Overall, individualized dosing guided by therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), organ function, and validated PK principles remains essential to optimize therapy in this complex population.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Francis Man, Peter J. Gawne, Rafael T. M. de Rosales
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2019
- Liposomes
- Radioisotopes
- Drug Delivery Systems
DIPSA D SHASTRI, MOUNICA VORLA, PRASHIL DAVE, et al.
CHEST, 2023
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Structured knowledge from the free knowledge base
Linked open data from Wikidata (Q408529), a free and open knowledge base operated by the Wikimedia Foundation. Data is available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication. WHO INN from the World Health Organization.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.