Alendronic acid 70mg / Colecalciferol 70microgram tablets
Requires a prescription from a doctor or prescriber
Official documents, adverse reaction reporting, and safety monitoring
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Official medicine documents
Yellow Card
Report side effects (MHRA)
Drug safety updates
MHRA alerts for Alendronic acid + Colecalciferol
Safety monitoring data
Yellow Card reports
The MHRA Yellow Card scheme collects reports of suspected side effects from healthcare professionals and patients. View the Drug Analysis Profile (iDAP) for real-world adverse reaction data.
View Drug Analysis Profile
Browse all Drug Analysis Profiles A–Z
Browse all iDAP reports
Interactive Drug Analysis Profiles for all medicines
Report a side effect
Submit a Yellow Card report to the MHRA
Data from the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. A reported reaction does not necessarily mean the medicine caused it. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
EudraVigilance
The European Medicines Agency (EMA) collects suspected adverse reaction reports from across the EU/EEA through the EudraVigilance system. Search for safety data on this medicine.
Search EudraVigilance database
Browse substances A–Z in the European adverse reaction database
About EudraVigilance
Learn about EU pharmacovigilance and safety monitoring
EudraVigilance data is published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A suspected adverse reaction is not necessarily caused by the medicine.
11 branded products available
MHRA licensed products
View all licensed products for Alendronic acid + Colecalciferol on the MHRA register
Fosavance tablets
Fosavance tablets
Fosavance tablets
Alendronic acid 70mg / Colecalciferol 70microgram tablets
Alliance Healthcare (Distribution) Ltd
This is the NHS Drug Tariff indicative price used for reimbursement purposes. It may not reflect the price paid by patients or pharmacies.
View full Drug TariffSource: NHS Drug Tariff via NHSBSA. Derived from dm+d VMPP (Virtual Medicinal Product Pack) pricing data. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
WHO defined daily dose (DDD)
10 mg
Not a recommended dose. The DDD is the assumed average maintenance dose per day for a drug used for its main indication in adults. It is a statistical measure used for research and comparison purposes only.
Source: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, distributed via the NHS dm+d supplementary BNF/ATC mapping files (NHSBSA). Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
Therapeutically similar medicines
Similarity is based on WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification and on a factual NHS dm+d therapeutic-grouping code prefix. Source data: NHS dm+d via TRUD (OGL v3.0), WHO ATC/DDD Index.
NHS prescribing volume and spending trends
Check stock at pharmacies and supply information
Pharmacy stock checkers
Search for this medicine at major UK pharmacy chains. These links open the retailer's own website — results depend on their current online catalogue.
Supply & safety information
Official UK regulator monitoring and safety alerts
Pharmacy links redirect to the retailer's own search and do not represent real-time stock levels. Shortage and safety information sourced from MHRA drug safety updates (gov.uk, Crown Copyright under OGL v3.0).
Codes for healthcare professionals and prescribing systems
These codes are used by healthcare IT systems and prescribers to identify this medicine.
NHS UK identifiers
Browse tools
SNOMED CT and dm+d codes from NHS TRUD (Technology Reference data Update Distribution), licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. BNF code shown is the factual mapping value distributed by NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) in the dm+d supplementary file under OGL v3.0; it is not affiliated with, nor licensed from, the publishers of the British National Formulary. ATC codes from the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (whocc.no).
Active and completed clinical studies from ClinicalTrials.gov
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health (NIH). Data accessed via ClinicalTrials.gov API v2. Trial information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Academic studies and reviews for this medicine's active substance
Showing all 12 studies.
Reviews & meta-analyses: 2 · 2023–2025
Showing all 12 studies, sorted by most relevant.
Aine Jakonyte, Egle Gustainyte, Žygimantas Petronis, et al.
Medicina, 2025
- Diphosphonates
- Imidazoles
- Osteonecrosis
Background and Objectives: Bisphosphonates (BP) like zoledronic acid (ZA) and alendronic acid (AA) are used for osteoporosis (OP) or other bone-related conditions as well as to prevent the spread of metastases and in rheumatoid arthritis treatment. However, they have been associated with an increased risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). This systematic review aimed to assess the incidence and risk of ONJ in osteoporotic patients treated with ZA or AA and evaluate the impact of treatment duration. Material and Methods: The systematic literature review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The keywords “Zoledronic acid,” “Alendronic acid,” “Osteoporosis,” and “Osteonecrosis” were searched in PubMed and ScienceDirect databases. Selection criteria included studies on humans written in English, published from 2014. The systematic review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO register under the following number: CRD42024587046. Results: A total of 7 studies with 98,717 osteoporotic patients met the criteria, showing a higher ONJ incidence with ZA than AA. Six studies linked longer BP use to increased ONJ risk, which quadrupled after 5 years of AA use. A positive correlation was found between BP use (≥3 years) and ONJ in OP patients, primarily affecting females over 60. ONJ appeared after 1 year with AA, increasing over time, while ZA-related ONJ emerged as early as 5 months with a higher overall incidence. Conclusions: ZA poses a higher ONJ risk and incidence and earlier onset than AA, occurring within 5 months versus 1 year for AA. These findings emphasize the need for careful monitoring, especially in long-term BP therapy with additional risk factors.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Li JW, Lei XD, Dai B
2025
Objective: This study analyzed severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) linked to anti-osteoporosis drugs using FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data and characterized implicated drugs and clinical features through a literature review. Methods: A retrospective disproportionality analysis of SCAR reports from FAERS (2004-2024) utilized signal detection metrics, including reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN). A structured literature search across PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus gathered case reports of SCARs induced by anti-osteoporosis drugs. Results: Of 77,789 SCAR reports, 399 (0.51%) involved anti-osteoporosis drugs, mainly affecting female patients (76.25%) with a median age of 69 years. Denosumab (24%), alendronate (23.25%), and zoledronic acid (17.13%) were most frequently reported. Significant signals included risedronic acid with erythema multiforme [ROR = 9.06; PRR = 9.03; information component (IC) = 3.17], zoledronic acid with cutaneous vasculitis (ROR = 3.15; PRR = 3.15; IC = 1.65), and alendronic acid with Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) (ROR = 4.03; PRR = 4.02; IC = 2.00). The literature review (33 cases) confirmed a median symptom onset of 22 days, with treatments often involving corticosteroids and supportive care. Conclusion: Anti-osteoporosis drugs, notably bisphosphonates and strontium ranelate, are rarely linked to SCARs but may cause serious consequences. Increased clinical awareness, pre-treatment risk evaluation, and vigilant monitoring are essential for at-risk patients.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Hong Gao, Chen Wang, Wenqi Zhang, et al.
Separation and Purification Technology, 2025
Federica Rizzi, A. Panniello, R. Comparelli, et al.
Molecules, 2024
- Bone and Bones
- Cholecalciferol
- Micelles
Vitamin D, an essential micronutrient crucial for skeletal integrity and various non-skeletal physiological functions, exhibits limited bioavailability and stability in vivo. This study is focused on the development of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-grafted phospholipid micellar nanostructures co-encapsulating vitamin D3 and conjugated with alendronic acid, aimed at active bone targeting. Furthermore, these nanostructures are rendered optically traceable in the UV-visible region of the electromagnetic spectrum via the simultaneous encapsulation of vitamin D3 with carbon dots, a newly emerging class of fluorescents, biocompatible nanoparticles characterized by their resistance to photobleaching and environmental friendliness, which hold promise for future in vitro bioimaging studies. A systematic investigation is conducted to optimize experimental parameters for the preparation of micellar nanostructures with an average hydrodynamic diameter below 200 nm, ensuring colloidal stability in physiological media while preserving the optical luminescent properties of the encapsulated carbon dots. Comprehensive chemical-physical characterization of these micellar nanostructures is performed employing optical and morphological techniques. Furthermore, their binding affinity for the principal inorganic constituent of bone tissue is assessed through a binding assay with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles, indicating significant potential for active bone-targeting. These formulated nanostructures hold promise for novel therapeutic interventions to address skeletal-related complications in cancer affected patients in the future.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Henry Lonsdale, Rupali Sawant, Andrew Kinshuck, et al.
BMJ Case Reports, 2024
- Alendronate
- Bone Density Conservation Agents
- Respiratory Aspiration
M. Méndez-González, Karime ESTRELLA-HERNÁNDEZ, Karla Navarrete-Olvera, et al.
European Endodontic Journal, 2025
- Chelating Agents
- Dentin
- Edetic Acid
OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to evaluate the changes in the physicochemical properties of dentine after irrigation with a solution of 0.22% alendronic acid (AA) as a chelating agent compared to 17% ethylene-diaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). METHODS: A total of 48 extracted premolars and molars that were intact, free of caries or cracks, without root canal treatment and restorations were collected. The roots were randomised into three groups (n=16): Group A: Distilled Water (dH2O); Group B: 17% EDTA, and Group C: 0.22% AA. Longitudinal sections of the dentine with a root of 1x1x10 mm were made with a diamond disc and a low-speed handpiece for bending tests (n=9). For morphological analysis, images were taken with a scanning electron microscope, crystallographic analysis with X-ray diffraction, and chemical analysis with Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and Vickers Hardness. For this purpose, cross-sections were made through the root using the Isomet to obtain 3 mm thick dentine discs (n=14). The samples were stored in dH2O for up to 24 h before use and dried at room temperature before exposure to chelating solutions for 1 h in a Stuart STR6D mixer at 50 rpm. For data comparison, the Kruskal-Wallis statistical test was used (α=0.05). RESULTS: The chelating solutions of EDTA and AA cause alterations in the physicochemical structure of dentine, attacking mainly the inorganic part (Hydroxyapatite), which was observed in the decrease in intensity of the peaks in the X-ray diffraction pattern of hydroxyapatite. This generated a greater exposure of the collagen fibres that were observed in SEM and the increase in the bands characteristic to Collagen Type I in the infrared spectrum at 1645, 1550, and 1240 cm-1 belonging to amide I (C=O), amide II (N-H) and amide III (C-N), significantly affecting its dentine hardness (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: AA can be used as a chelating agent in the area of dentistry. It does not generate a significant demineralising effect that modifies the physicochemical properties of dentine, as observed with EDTA.
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
Reactions Weekly, 2024
Reactions Weekly, 2023
Reactions Weekly, 2024
Reactions Weekly, 2025
Sources: aggregated from Europe PMC (EMBL-EBI), OpenAlex, Crossref, PubMed and other open scholarly databases. Retracted articles are excluded. Study information is provided for research purposes and does not constitute medical advice.
Scientific data (pharmacology, interactions, ADME) is not yet available for this medicine. Clinical sections are sourced from the NHS dm+d database.